Kaelyn Moore

Everyone in the entire country and even today is very confused as to how this could have happened, how a jury of 12 peers all agreed that Casey was not guilty for anything. Yeah.

And you would have thought that that would have actually helped her case. And so that's why I want to bring up this book, Acquittal, by Richard Gabriel. I have it here. I read this. He is a consultant for high profile cases. And he comes in and basically helps people build their case. So he came in and he helped the defense. Yes. Mm-hmm.

And you would have thought that that would have actually helped her case. And so that's why I want to bring up this book, Acquittal, by Richard Gabriel. I have it here. I read this. He is a consultant for high profile cases. And he comes in and basically helps people build their case. So he came in and he helped the defense. Yes. Mm-hmm.

And you would have thought that that would have actually helped her case. And so that's why I want to bring up this book, Acquittal, by Richard Gabriel. I have it here. I read this. He is a consultant for high profile cases. And he comes in and basically helps people build their case. So he came in and he helped the defense. Yes. Mm-hmm.

So they're having a really hard time building a jury because everyone automatically thinks that Casey's guilty. And also the death penalty is on the table. So this is like a huge deal. What Richard suggests they do is build like a mock jury of 12 people. They get 12 people together. They pull everyone. Every single person thinks that she did it.

So they're having a really hard time building a jury because everyone automatically thinks that Casey's guilty. And also the death penalty is on the table. So this is like a huge deal. What Richard suggests they do is build like a mock jury of 12 people. They get 12 people together. They pull everyone. Every single person thinks that she did it.

So they're having a really hard time building a jury because everyone automatically thinks that Casey's guilty. And also the death penalty is on the table. So this is like a huge deal. What Richard suggests they do is build like a mock jury of 12 people. They get 12 people together. They pull everyone. Every single person thinks that she did it.

So they're like, okay, we're going to run through a fake trial and we just want to figure out where you guys start getting confused. And what he noticed, this is so interesting, is when they were talking about Casey being a bad mom, Casey partying, Casey not looking for her daughter for 31 days, everyone was like, she's guilty, she's guilty, she's guilty. Right.

So they're like, okay, we're going to run through a fake trial and we just want to figure out where you guys start getting confused. And what he noticed, this is so interesting, is when they were talking about Casey being a bad mom, Casey partying, Casey not looking for her daughter for 31 days, everyone was like, she's guilty, she's guilty, she's guilty. Right.

So they're like, okay, we're going to run through a fake trial and we just want to figure out where you guys start getting confused. And what he noticed, this is so interesting, is when they were talking about Casey being a bad mom, Casey partying, Casey not looking for her daughter for 31 days, everyone was like, she's guilty, she's guilty, she's guilty. Right.

The second they started entering the evidence into the trial, people started getting confused. And there's a few things that they really got confused about. So one of the things was the chloroform test that was pulled. Because that was never done in a court before. That was like totally new science. And for this jury, they were like, wait. There's no DNA evidence that Casey did this.

The second they started entering the evidence into the trial, people started getting confused. And there's a few things that they really got confused about. So one of the things was the chloroform test that was pulled. Because that was never done in a court before. That was like totally new science. And for this jury, they were like, wait. There's no DNA evidence that Casey did this.

The second they started entering the evidence into the trial, people started getting confused. And there's a few things that they really got confused about. So one of the things was the chloroform test that was pulled. Because that was never done in a court before. That was like totally new science. And for this jury, they were like, wait. There's no DNA evidence that Casey did this.

There's no DNA on the duct tape. There's no DNA really anywhere on the scene. But you want us to believe that you took an air sample from a car from six months after this happened and you were able to tell from that air sample. And even when you were describing the test, you were kind of getting confused. You're like, I don't. I said, watch a YouTube video, guys. Right.

There's no DNA on the duct tape. There's no DNA really anywhere on the scene. But you want us to believe that you took an air sample from a car from six months after this happened and you were able to tell from that air sample. And even when you were describing the test, you were kind of getting confused. You're like, I don't. I said, watch a YouTube video, guys. Right.

There's no DNA on the duct tape. There's no DNA really anywhere on the scene. But you want us to believe that you took an air sample from a car from six months after this happened and you were able to tell from that air sample. And even when you were describing the test, you were kind of getting confused. You're like, I don't. I said, watch a YouTube video, guys. Right.

I want to phone a scientist. Yeah. Where's my scientist friend? Well, imagine being on a jury and having that explained to you. All of the jurors are feeling the same way, too. They're like, I just don't know that I can trust the science. I don't understand how it works. Yeah.

I want to phone a scientist. Yeah. Where's my scientist friend? Well, imagine being on a jury and having that explained to you. All of the jurors are feeling the same way, too. They're like, I just don't know that I can trust the science. I don't understand how it works. Yeah.

I want to phone a scientist. Yeah. Where's my scientist friend? Well, imagine being on a jury and having that explained to you. All of the jurors are feeling the same way, too. They're like, I just don't know that I can trust the science. I don't understand how it works. Yeah.

Well, here's the thing, too, is it was a death penalty case. So these jurors needed to be extra certain that they were sending the correct person to the electric chair or else they were not going to be able to sleep at night. So you have to really prove beyond a reasonable doubt. This is not just a murder charge. This is a death penalty case.