Kate Leinbaugh

Her top two defense attorneys making this argument are very experienced.

In this trial, that strategy was on display after the former software engineering chief testified about Javisa's orange jumpsuit comment. Immediately, one of her attorneys sprung into action.

In this trial, that strategy was on display after the former software engineering chief testified about Javisa's orange jumpsuit comment. Immediately, one of her attorneys sprung into action.

In this trial, that strategy was on display after the former software engineering chief testified about Javisa's orange jumpsuit comment. Immediately, one of her attorneys sprung into action.

Beyond trying to discredit the prosecution's witnesses, the defense tried to make the case that JP Morgan didn't thoroughly vet Frank's business. They called a former lower-level JP Morgan employee to the stand.

Beyond trying to discredit the prosecution's witnesses, the defense tried to make the case that JP Morgan didn't thoroughly vet Frank's business. They called a former lower-level JP Morgan employee to the stand.

Beyond trying to discredit the prosecution's witnesses, the defense tried to make the case that JP Morgan didn't thoroughly vet Frank's business. They called a former lower-level JP Morgan employee to the stand.

Javisa's lawyers cross-examined another JPMorgan employee, the executive who led the deal to buy Frank. The defense lawyers pulled up some of this executive's text messages. And in one text, she referred to an annual shareholder letter written by J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.

Javisa's lawyers cross-examined another JPMorgan employee, the executive who led the deal to buy Frank. The defense lawyers pulled up some of this executive's text messages. And in one text, she referred to an annual shareholder letter written by J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.

Javisa's lawyers cross-examined another JPMorgan employee, the executive who led the deal to buy Frank. The defense lawyers pulled up some of this executive's text messages. And in one text, she referred to an annual shareholder letter written by J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.

J.P. Morgan did do some due diligence. They hired a third-party company to examine and validate the more than 4 million users that Frank said it had.

J.P. Morgan did do some due diligence. They hired a third-party company to examine and validate the more than 4 million users that Frank said it had.

J.P. Morgan did do some due diligence. They hired a third-party company to examine and validate the more than 4 million users that Frank said it had.

At the trial, another J.P. Morgan executive said that he expected this third-party company had been doing more than just counting rows in a spreadsheet. In testimony, a representative from the third-party company said it actually offered to do more validation work on the data file, but that J.P. Morgan didn't express interest in doing that.

At the trial, another J.P. Morgan executive said that he expected this third-party company had been doing more than just counting rows in a spreadsheet. In testimony, a representative from the third-party company said it actually offered to do more validation work on the data file, but that J.P. Morgan didn't express interest in doing that.

At the trial, another J.P. Morgan executive said that he expected this third-party company had been doing more than just counting rows in a spreadsheet. In testimony, a representative from the third-party company said it actually offered to do more validation work on the data file, but that J.P. Morgan didn't express interest in doing that.

In closing arguments, the prosecution told the jury this was a clear case of fraud. The defense said it was buyer's remorse. And after five weeks of testimony, it was up to the 12 people on the jury to decide. Last Thursday, they started their deliberations. And on Friday, they were still deliberating.

In closing arguments, the prosecution told the jury this was a clear case of fraud. The defense said it was buyer's remorse. And after five weeks of testimony, it was up to the 12 people on the jury to decide. Last Thursday, they started their deliberations. And on Friday, they were still deliberating.

In closing arguments, the prosecution told the jury this was a clear case of fraud. The defense said it was buyer's remorse. And after five weeks of testimony, it was up to the 12 people on the jury to decide. Last Thursday, they started their deliberations. And on Friday, they were still deliberating.

Javis and her co-defendant, a former executive at Frank, were both found guilty on three counts of fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit fraud. Both could go to jail for decades.