Kathrine Robertson

And you didn't see these wide disparities in the way they were reading law.

Certainly they'd have disagreements, but it wasn't all the time.

I think what you've seen, especially in the last decade, is that whether we want to admit it or not, it's just become a lot more...

And I mean, you've got Kagan and Sotomayor right now in the United States Supreme Court that wouldn't agree on much of anything that the state of Alabama put before them.

Now, there are exceptions to that, but by and large, you know how cases are going to break down based on the topic.

And I think this girl sports case that they heard last week is going to be fascinating because there's just no way an intellectually honest person could believe that our laws or our Constitution were ever meant to permit that or to take the power away from the states to be able to prohibit it.

But yet I think very few people expect that to be a 9-0 decision.

Now, maybe I'll be wrong, but I just don't think they can bring themselves to take in the right position because they were so ideological.

But that's what you get.

When you have a president, you know, Biden, who put Jackson on the court, who says, you know, we're going to have the first black woman and like, I don't care that, you know, this is what I want.

And that tells you, you know, he's he's directing exactly what he wants out of that vote.

And, you know, it's not surprising that we're just all over the map when it comes to the United States Supreme Court.

It's absolutely ridiculous.

You're silly.

It is.

Sometimes you have to take a step back and just go, what are we doing?

And I've been beat by some 90-year-old men who can hit backspin that I can't follow, so yeah.

You know what I think is the virtue signal that went too far.

It's the virtue signal.

And I think this issue ran away from the left.