Keith Kellogg
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I would say let's set it at 100 days and move our way back. And figure a way we can do this in the near term to make sure that this solution is solid, it's sustainable, and that this war ends so that we stop the carnage. I think that's going to be very important to do.
I would say let's set it at 100 days and move our way back. And figure a way we can do this in the near term to make sure that this solution is solid, it's sustainable, and that this war ends so that we stop the carnage. I think that's going to be very important to do.
I would say let's set it at 100 days and move our way back. And figure a way we can do this in the near term to make sure that this solution is solid, it's sustainable, and that this war ends so that we stop the carnage. I think that's going to be very important to do.
It's going to be important for our national security, it's part of our vital national interest, and it's also good for Europe as well, and the globe as well.
It's going to be important for our national security, it's part of our vital national interest, and it's also good for Europe as well, and the globe as well.
It's going to be important for our national security, it's part of our vital national interest, and it's also good for Europe as well, and the globe as well.
Out of the box, he's trying to engage and he's putting the United States in a position of global leadership. So when you look at it historically, there's a lot of things he is saying is very, very accurate. HISTORICALLY, AND IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE INTERNATIONALLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE FOR THE FUTURE.
Out of the box, he's trying to engage and he's putting the United States in a position of global leadership. So when you look at it historically, there's a lot of things he is saying is very, very accurate. HISTORICALLY, AND IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE INTERNATIONALLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE FOR THE FUTURE.
Out of the box, he's trying to engage and he's putting the United States in a position of global leadership. So when you look at it historically, there's a lot of things he is saying is very, very accurate. HISTORICALLY, AND IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE INTERNATIONALLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE FOR THE FUTURE.
YOU KNOW, WHEN IT COMES TO PANAMA, I WAS AN ASSAULT BRIGADE COMMANDER DURING JUST CAUSE, THE INVASION OF PANAMA. WE ACTUALLY DID TAKE THE PANAMA CANAL BACK IN THE LATE 80s DURING OPERATION JUST CAUSE, AND THREE WEEKS LATER WE GAVE IT BACK TO THEM. SO WE'VE TAKEN IT BEFORE.
YOU KNOW, WHEN IT COMES TO PANAMA, I WAS AN ASSAULT BRIGADE COMMANDER DURING JUST CAUSE, THE INVASION OF PANAMA. WE ACTUALLY DID TAKE THE PANAMA CANAL BACK IN THE LATE 80s DURING OPERATION JUST CAUSE, AND THREE WEEKS LATER WE GAVE IT BACK TO THEM. SO WE'VE TAKEN IT BEFORE.
YOU KNOW, WHEN IT COMES TO PANAMA, I WAS AN ASSAULT BRIGADE COMMANDER DURING JUST CAUSE, THE INVASION OF PANAMA. WE ACTUALLY DID TAKE THE PANAMA CANAL BACK IN THE LATE 80s DURING OPERATION JUST CAUSE, AND THREE WEEKS LATER WE GAVE IT BACK TO THEM. SO WE'VE TAKEN IT BEFORE.
And I think his point about the Chinese running the canal is a good point because over 70% of the commerce that goes through the Panama Canal is, in fact, American. So it is in our vital interest, in our vital national interest, that that canal stays sovereign.
And I think his point about the Chinese running the canal is a good point because over 70% of the commerce that goes through the Panama Canal is, in fact, American. So it is in our vital interest, in our vital national interest, that that canal stays sovereign.
And I think his point about the Chinese running the canal is a good point because over 70% of the commerce that goes through the Panama Canal is, in fact, American. So it is in our vital interest, in our vital national interest, that that canal stays sovereign.
You know, I don't want to divulge anything that the president says or doesn't say because he speaks for himself. I do not speak for him. We've had an opportunity to talk about it. And we'll have more after the 20th of January when he's officially the president, not president-elect.
You know, I don't want to divulge anything that the president says or doesn't say because he speaks for himself. I do not speak for him. We've had an opportunity to talk about it. And we'll have more after the 20th of January when he's officially the president, not president-elect.
You know, I don't want to divulge anything that the president says or doesn't say because he speaks for himself. I do not speak for him. We've had an opportunity to talk about it. And we'll have more after the 20th of January when he's officially the president, not president-elect.