Kelly Hyman

Yes.

So if people overheard this, they could potentially be the state's witness.

And what that means is they will testify in the trial of saying what they've heard or potentially testify.

if they could potentially be charged with aiding and abetting and assisting in this in fact if they don't if they help assist with this murder and stuff like that so it'll be interesting to see what transpires in the coming next days and and who turns as a state witness or potentially are there going to be additional charges for people who overheard stuff and were potentially involved in this as well

Ultimately, that will be up to the state to make a determination on whether they believe that they can bring it based on the facts and evidence of the case.

But there is a lot of evidence that is coming out.

And Nancy, to your point about the alleged about the judge, it is very, very disconcerting.

because judges are the ones that preside over the case and they're the ones that make determinations.

And so the fact that there is allegations of harming a judge, which is very disconcerting and very upsetting, but ultimately no one, no matter who you are, is above the law and people need to be held accountable.

And ultimately that will be up to the jury of whether they're innocent or guilty in this case.

Oh, this guy is dangerous. Another woman has now come forward alleging Combs of sexual assault. She claims she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Combs.

Oh, this guy is dangerous. Another woman has now come forward alleging Combs of sexual assault. She claims she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Combs.

Well, no one is above the law, but the state who brings the case has the burden of proof, the government. And so they must prove every single element of the cause of action. And then when someone brings a motion to dismiss, basically saying that you're asking the court to dismiss a case, to dismiss account of a case, and then you make legal argument.

Well, no one is above the law, but the state who brings the case has the burden of proof, the government. And so they must prove every single element of the cause of action. And then when someone brings a motion to dismiss, basically saying that you're asking the court to dismiss a case, to dismiss account of a case, and then you make legal argument.

But ultimately, the judge is going to look at the law because that's the key thing. Look at the law and based on the law and facts presented, whether this third cause of action should be ultimately dismissed.

But ultimately, the judge is going to look at the law because that's the key thing. Look at the law and based on the law and facts presented, whether this third cause of action should be ultimately dismissed.

Well, ultimately, that's going to be up to the judge to make that determination looking at the law. It's important to remember in the court of law that you are innocent till proven guilty. That is really important because since the government, the state brings the case, they have to make sure that they have substantial evidence for this. And one of the potential arguments for a motion to dismiss

Well, ultimately, that's going to be up to the judge to make that determination looking at the law. It's important to remember in the court of law that you are innocent till proven guilty. That is really important because since the government, the state brings the case, they have to make sure that they have substantial evidence for this. And one of the potential arguments for a motion to dismiss

legally is that they cannot prove their case, that they cannot prove the certain elements of the crime. Ultimately, we'll see what the judge does in this matter, whether to dismiss it or to say, no, this is going to go forward.

legally is that they cannot prove their case, that they cannot prove the certain elements of the crime. Ultimately, we'll see what the judge does in this matter, whether to dismiss it or to say, no, this is going to go forward.