Kelly Hyman

But it's also important to remember from a legal standpoint that the other side, when someone files this, will have an opportunity to respond, will give them an opportunity in the court pleadings to make their argument why this count should not be dismissed.

But it's also important to remember from a legal standpoint that the other side, when someone files this, will have an opportunity to respond, will give them an opportunity in the court pleadings to make their argument why this count should not be dismissed.

The judge could potentially set a hearing, yes, in regard to this. Sometimes the judge will rule on the paper. And what that means is one side will file the motion to dismiss, the other side will respond to it, but possibly the other side will get a reply. In other words, a reply to the response And then the judge could set a hearing and have oral arguments.

The judge could potentially set a hearing, yes, in regard to this. Sometimes the judge will rule on the paper. And what that means is one side will file the motion to dismiss, the other side will respond to it, but possibly the other side will get a reply. In other words, a reply to the response And then the judge could set a hearing and have oral arguments.

And what that means from a legal perspective, the oral arguments is each side will get to stand up in front of the judge and make their arguments to the court, basically plead their case and say why the judge should rule accordingly.

And what that means from a legal perspective, the oral arguments is each side will get to stand up in front of the judge and make their arguments to the court, basically plead their case and say why the judge should rule accordingly.

Or the judge could look at the papers, look at the law that substantiates the different position, PDD's position, the state's position, the government's position, and then just rule on that and issue an order basically saying either, yes, I agree, this count should be dismissed, or no, it should not be dismissed.

Or the judge could look at the papers, look at the law that substantiates the different position, PDD's position, the state's position, the government's position, and then just rule on that and issue an order basically saying either, yes, I agree, this count should be dismissed, or no, it should not be dismissed.

So when you look at a class action, it's important to remember in a class action that there is one person that's kind of like the class representative. They're like the spokesperson, a person that speaks for the class. And then there's other peoples as well. One argument can be made from Diddy's standpoint that the people are not similarly situated.

So when you look at a class action, it's important to remember in a class action that there is one person that's kind of like the class representative. They're like the spokesperson, a person that speaks for the class. And then there's other peoples as well. One argument can be made from Diddy's standpoint that the people are not similarly situated.

Each one has their own unique facts, their own unique injuries and harm. And so based on that, that there cannot be a class action. However, the other side of the coin could say that potentially if you look from legally, if people are similarly situated, they've gone and experienced the same thing, then there could be a class action. However, I most likely see these in individual cases.

Each one has their own unique facts, their own unique injuries and harm. And so based on that, that there cannot be a class action. However, the other side of the coin could say that potentially if you look from legally, if people are similarly situated, they've gone and experienced the same thing, then there could be a class action. However, I most likely see these in individual cases.

And it's important to remember about the individual cases that these are civil lawsuits. And so what that means is the compensation is going to be key in the case. So if the court determines that the person should prevail, the plaintiff in those civil cases, it's not jail time, it's monetary compensation to make them whole. So how much

And it's important to remember about the individual cases that these are civil lawsuits. And so what that means is the compensation is going to be key in the case. So if the court determines that the person should prevail, the plaintiff in those civil cases, it's not jail time, it's monetary compensation to make them whole. So how much

the court makes a determination, or the jury, if the case goes to a jury trial, what is it going to take compensation-wise to make him or her whole? However, on the other, the criminal, that's where we're looking at penalties with potentially life in prison.

the court makes a determination, or the jury, if the case goes to a jury trial, what is it going to take compensation-wise to make him or her whole? However, on the other, the criminal, that's where we're looking at penalties with potentially life in prison.

Could potentially, if someone makes that determination or haven't seen any class actions, mostly seen the individual cases with specific facts that relate to the person and then different causes of action that they bring forward based on the facts and circumstances for that individual person.

Could potentially, if someone makes that determination or haven't seen any class actions, mostly seen the individual cases with specific facts that relate to the person and then different causes of action that they bring forward based on the facts and circumstances for that individual person.

That is potentially possible. Haven't seen anything like that yet, but I think there's going to be a lot more as you guys are fully in depth and covering all this, a lot more that's going to come forward as we get closer to the criminal trial as well.

That is potentially possible. Haven't seen anything like that yet, but I think there's going to be a lot more as you guys are fully in depth and covering all this, a lot more that's going to come forward as we get closer to the criminal trial as well.