Kellyanne Conway

I actually think—I hope those Republicans win and we keep the seats. I actually think if they don't, it's not—everybody's going to rush and say the same thing as the Lemmings always do. Oh, my God, it shows that Trump's not popular. He doesn't have the juices. Administration's over. Signal, signal, signal. I actually think it's the opposite.

It shows what I just said yet again, which is if you're not him and you're not at the top of the ticket, then there's something special about him where people gravitate toward him, turn out for him, whether it's at rallies, whether in the bleeding sun or the pouring rain for days to wait just to see him and be part of it. That's something that the party will need to grapple with.

It shows what I just said yet again, which is if you're not him and you're not at the top of the ticket, then there's something special about him where people gravitate toward him, turn out for him, whether it's at rallies, whether in the bleeding sun or the pouring rain for days to wait just to see him and be part of it. That's something that the party will need to grapple with.

It shows what I just said yet again, which is if you're not him and you're not at the top of the ticket, then there's something special about him where people gravitate toward him, turn out for him, whether it's at rallies, whether in the bleeding sun or the pouring rain for days to wait just to see him and be part of it. That's something that the party will need to grapple with.

I don't think we're going to go back to being this sort of Maybe globalist amnesty, maybe some higher taxes, maybe not a lot of D-reg, maybe Bubba restrain this, restrain that kind of party that was a losing model for Mitt Romney, for John McCain.

I don't think we're going to go back to being this sort of Maybe globalist amnesty, maybe some higher taxes, maybe not a lot of D-reg, maybe Bubba restrain this, restrain that kind of party that was a losing model for Mitt Romney, for John McCain.

I don't think we're going to go back to being this sort of Maybe globalist amnesty, maybe some higher taxes, maybe not a lot of D-reg, maybe Bubba restrain this, restrain that kind of party that was a losing model for Mitt Romney, for John McCain.

I think that along with Ronald Reagan, 1980, Newt Gingrich and the contract with America, 94, Trump, 2016, those are like the three most transformative parties. party-changing, coalition-shifting elections in my lifetime and so in many of our lifetimes. So I feel like he'll still have his mark on the party. There is no obvious heir apparent.

I think that along with Ronald Reagan, 1980, Newt Gingrich and the contract with America, 94, Trump, 2016, those are like the three most transformative parties. party-changing, coalition-shifting elections in my lifetime and so in many of our lifetimes. So I feel like he'll still have his mark on the party. There is no obvious heir apparent.

I think that along with Ronald Reagan, 1980, Newt Gingrich and the contract with America, 94, Trump, 2016, those are like the three most transformative parties. party-changing, coalition-shifting elections in my lifetime and so in many of our lifetimes. So I feel like he'll still have his mark on the party. There is no obvious heir apparent.

Obviously, his vice president would have a good chance, but the president himself said he's not endorsing Vice President Vance or anyone else right now, which is smart because he needs to do a lot of stuff. You can't talk about politics in 2020. You got to do policy in 2025. So that's smart. On the Democratic side, I think it's the worst I've seen the Democratic Party in a very, very long time.

Obviously, his vice president would have a good chance, but the president himself said he's not endorsing Vice President Vance or anyone else right now, which is smart because he needs to do a lot of stuff. You can't talk about politics in 2020. You got to do policy in 2025. So that's smart. On the Democratic side, I think it's the worst I've seen the Democratic Party in a very, very long time.

Obviously, his vice president would have a good chance, but the president himself said he's not endorsing Vice President Vance or anyone else right now, which is smart because he needs to do a lot of stuff. You can't talk about politics in 2020. You got to do policy in 2025. So that's smart. On the Democratic side, I think it's the worst I've seen the Democratic Party in a very, very long time.

It just seems rudderless, shiftless, overly angry, without direction, probably a lot of internal fighting that we don't even see. And it's, you know, in any 12-step program, Jessica, even if you reduce it to eight, nine, or expand it to 20 steps, the first one must be acknowledgment. And I haven't seen that yet, let alone getting to acceptance.

It just seems rudderless, shiftless, overly angry, without direction, probably a lot of internal fighting that we don't even see. And it's, you know, in any 12-step program, Jessica, even if you reduce it to eight, nine, or expand it to 20 steps, the first one must be acknowledgment. And I haven't seen that yet, let alone getting to acceptance.

It just seems rudderless, shiftless, overly angry, without direction, probably a lot of internal fighting that we don't even see. And it's, you know, in any 12-step program, Jessica, even if you reduce it to eight, nine, or expand it to 20 steps, the first one must be acknowledgment. And I haven't seen that yet, let alone getting to acceptance.

I haven't seen acknowledging the fact that Kamala Harris had everything she wanted. Stop with the, she only had 100 days or whatnot. What would she have done on day 108 or 109? Same stuff. I mean, she had all the king's horses, all the king's men, the mainstream media, academia, plenty of money, excitement, history on her side, et cetera, making history on her side. That wasn't the right model.

I haven't seen acknowledging the fact that Kamala Harris had everything she wanted. Stop with the, she only had 100 days or whatnot. What would she have done on day 108 or 109? Same stuff. I mean, she had all the king's horses, all the king's men, the mainstream media, academia, plenty of money, excitement, history on her side, et cetera, making history on her side. That wasn't the right model.

I haven't seen acknowledging the fact that Kamala Harris had everything she wanted. Stop with the, she only had 100 days or whatnot. What would she have done on day 108 or 109? Same stuff. I mean, she had all the king's horses, all the king's men, the mainstream media, academia, plenty of money, excitement, history on her side, et cetera, making history on her side. That wasn't the right model.

And I think even some of these governors and folks in the House or Senate who could be rising up as Democratic spokespeople are physiologically incapable— of answering a question or declaring a sentence without saying Trump, Trump, Trump four times in it.