Kelsey Piper

In a lot of ways, I think it's like managing a very junior employee where their first answer is not going to be very good, but you want to be patient and you want to say, okay, actually, I was looking for something more like this. Do you think you can try it again with that in mind?

In a lot of ways, I think it's like managing a very junior employee where their first answer is not going to be very good, but you want to be patient and you want to say, okay, actually, I was looking for something more like this. Do you think you can try it again with that in mind?

In a lot of ways, I think it's like managing a very junior employee where their first answer is not going to be very good, but you want to be patient and you want to say, okay, actually, I was looking for something more like this. Do you think you can try it again with that in mind?

I tend to think that technologies change how our brains are wired and how we think. And over time, we adjust and we learn and, you know, we develop good habits around them. But at the same time, you can do a lot of damage before we adjust and learn and develop good habits. It's very much a tool that depends what you make of it. you can use it to go understand something that you didn't understand.

I tend to think that technologies change how our brains are wired and how we think. And over time, we adjust and we learn and, you know, we develop good habits around them. But at the same time, you can do a lot of damage before we adjust and learn and develop good habits. It's very much a tool that depends what you make of it. you can use it to go understand something that you didn't understand.

I tend to think that technologies change how our brains are wired and how we think. And over time, we adjust and we learn and, you know, we develop good habits around them. But at the same time, you can do a lot of damage before we adjust and learn and develop good habits. It's very much a tool that depends what you make of it. you can use it to go understand something that you didn't understand.

It's like quite good at explaining minutiae of some issue you're interested in. You should double check its answers, but you should also double check an answer you get from a source, right? Like in a lot of ways, if you treat it as a source that's very smart, but not perfectly reliable, and you should check its claims, then you're in the right place.

It's like quite good at explaining minutiae of some issue you're interested in. You should double check its answers, but you should also double check an answer you get from a source, right? Like in a lot of ways, if you treat it as a source that's very smart, but not perfectly reliable, and you should check its claims, then you're in the right place.

It's like quite good at explaining minutiae of some issue you're interested in. You should double check its answers, but you should also double check an answer you get from a source, right? Like in a lot of ways, if you treat it as a source that's very smart, but not perfectly reliable, and you should check its claims, then you're in the right place.

But a lot of people probably aren't using it that way and are taking it as gospel or just using it to confirm what they already believe. And yeah, I think that's a very real risk.

But a lot of people probably aren't using it that way and are taking it as gospel or just using it to confirm what they already believe. And yeah, I think that's a very real risk.

But a lot of people probably aren't using it that way and are taking it as gospel or just using it to confirm what they already believe. And yeah, I think that's a very real risk.