Kemi Badenoch

The Conservatives lost. And... Labour won on a historic low share of the vote, 34%. I don't think any party has ever won with that number. But also, they won a landslide because of reform. So Labour are winning on a low share of the vote because people just want to kick us out. But the low share of the vote isn't just, you know, a majority of one.

The Conservatives lost. And... Labour won on a historic low share of the vote, 34%. I don't think any party has ever won with that number. But also, they won a landslide because of reform. So Labour are winning on a low share of the vote because people just want to kick us out. But the low share of the vote isn't just, you know, a majority of one.

The Conservatives lost. And... Labour won on a historic low share of the vote, 34%. I don't think any party has ever won with that number. But also, they won a landslide because of reform. So Labour are winning on a low share of the vote because people just want to kick us out. But the low share of the vote isn't just, you know, a majority of one.

It's a majority of a hundred and something, which is a landslide because reform were holding our legs. And they only won five seats despite having lots of votes spread around the country. And it was very much people voting to get conservatives out because they were just sick and tired of us, like what I call talking right and governing left, which annoys everybody.

It's a majority of a hundred and something, which is a landslide because reform were holding our legs. And they only won five seats despite having lots of votes spread around the country. And it was very much people voting to get conservatives out because they were just sick and tired of us, like what I call talking right and governing left, which annoys everybody.

It's a majority of a hundred and something, which is a landslide because reform were holding our legs. And they only won five seats despite having lots of votes spread around the country. And it was very much people voting to get conservatives out because they were just sick and tired of us, like what I call talking right and governing left, which annoys everybody.

Because the right doesn't get what it wants and the left doesn't like what it hears and doesn't recognize what you're doing. So they were sick of us. They were sick of the squabbling. There was a lot of infighting. And we would probably have lost anyway the natural fatigue that comes after 14 years in government. But the scale of the defeat was because of all of those other factors.

Because the right doesn't get what it wants and the left doesn't like what it hears and doesn't recognize what you're doing. So they were sick of us. They were sick of the squabbling. There was a lot of infighting. And we would probably have lost anyway the natural fatigue that comes after 14 years in government. But the scale of the defeat was because of all of those other factors.

Because the right doesn't get what it wants and the left doesn't like what it hears and doesn't recognize what you're doing. So they were sick of us. They were sick of the squabbling. There was a lot of infighting. And we would probably have lost anyway the natural fatigue that comes after 14 years in government. But the scale of the defeat was because of all of those other factors.

I think they probably would just have won. We would probably have had about 200 rather than 120. So they would have won, but we would have been a big opposition. I mean, I'm speculating. But if I look at the way the seats fell, maybe we would have had 250 and they'd have had 100.

I think they probably would just have won. We would probably have had about 200 rather than 120. So they would have won, but we would have been a big opposition. I mean, I'm speculating. But if I look at the way the seats fell, maybe we would have had 250 and they'd have had 100.

I think they probably would just have won. We would probably have had about 200 rather than 120. So they would have won, but we would have been a big opposition. I mean, I'm speculating. But if I look at the way the seats fell, maybe we would have had 250 and they'd have had 100.

He is very much a bureaucrat. And I think I don't even I don't even know if it's managerialism, because I don't think he even understands what the status quo is and is trying to manage it. What I see him as is and most of his cabinet is student politicians who have not grown up. So they are they are still very much at university. And the causes that they take over are different.

He is very much a bureaucrat. And I think I don't even I don't even know if it's managerialism, because I don't think he even understands what the status quo is and is trying to manage it. What I see him as is and most of his cabinet is student politicians who have not grown up. So they are they are still very much at university. And the causes that they take over are different.

He is very much a bureaucrat. And I think I don't even I don't even know if it's managerialism, because I don't think he even understands what the status quo is and is trying to manage it. What I see him as is and most of his cabinet is student politicians who have not grown up. So they are they are still very much at university. And the causes that they take over are different.

you know, student talking points.

you know, student talking points.

you know, student talking points.

Like, well, they're giving away these islands, the Chagos Islands, which is an absolute disgrace. And it's, I know that the reasoning behind it is, oh, it's anti-imperialism, but, There's an American defense base, Diego Garcia on there. We've bought this island many decades ago from Mauritius, but there's some international court judgments that have different rulings.

Like, well, they're giving away these islands, the Chagos Islands, which is an absolute disgrace. And it's, I know that the reasoning behind it is, oh, it's anti-imperialism, but, There's an American defense base, Diego Garcia on there. We've bought this island many decades ago from Mauritius, but there's some international court judgments that have different rulings.