Kenneth

Now, I do think safety's a real issue.

A lot of very talented young people, or at least a few, are walking away from massive holdings of equity in these big AI companies because they work on safety or are concerned about safety, and they're walking away from it.

And I think removing checks and balances on that's been a mistake.

The argument's, we got to beat China.

But what's wrong with that is China ends up getting everything that we do.

So if we accelerate our AI, maybe it keeps us a month ahead of them for a while, but it actually speeds up what they're doing.

I think safety and AI, thinking about regulation and AI,

is it's a mistake that we're not doing it.

And I'm all for the zeal for deregulate and let's not have bad regulations.

But I think actually this is the biggest thing that I kind of worry about at night with what we might be doing wrong.

Absolutely.

I mean, if you think about what sort of civilization changing, job changing, everything changing, AI is what to be concerned about.

I think slowing it down a bit, there are various ideas.

I don't want to endorse any of the crazier ones, but there are ideas.

It would be moving in the right direction.

Well, first of all, I think it's important that most of them do get their money back, that, you know, if this wasn't a legal tariff, then the United States has to pay it back.

On the other hand, $175 billion, that's a lot of money, but not in the context of the U.S.

budget.

It's kind of like chump change in terms of things.

And I'm sure the president, as economic advisers, knew this might happen.