Kevin Geist

regarding where she was or what time or how this worked.

And the defense claims that she was just trying to be helpful.

And the more she thought about it, the more details that came to light.

But of course, from a prosecution standpoint, you're looking at these as inconsistencies.

Yeah.

So throughout the entire trial, the defense attorney, John Schoenhorn, sort of said, you don't have any concrete evidence tying her to the case.

You don't have any sort of smoking gun, so to speak.

And they also leaned pretty hard on the idea that Fotis Doulos was a manipulator.

Fotis Doulos was someone that, you know, may have done it, but she was just sort of caught up in this love triangle.

Yeah, it's a long document.

The main arguments that she makes is that there was insufficient evidence as well as, you know, rulings on the police interviews.

So the defense claims that those police interviews should have never been let in.

Exactly.

Because there was a lack of ability, according to her defense attorney during the trial, to really sort of defend how those interviews were used in court.

Exactly.

It was a last second decision that they would be let in.

I mean, prosecutors really kind of dove right into those interviews and said, hey, let's take a look at these and highlight every single inconsistency.

So really sort of a tough thing for the defense to capitalize on from the get-go.

Right.

So it's in the hands of the appellate court.