Kevin Gorman

Somebody, because he has a good track record of playing in high leverage games, two Stanley Cup finals.

Now it looks like, although the last four minutes of that Ranger game looked bad from all of them, and he gave up some goals there, but it looks like he's a pretty good guy that he's at the end of a contract.

Would you just trade him because he's at the end of the contract, ride him out with no guarantee you're getting anything in return, or trade him to get something in return?

You're not going to get a first-round pick.

No.

Nope.

A second-round pick?

Maybe.

Or a player or somebody else that you can pluck from somebody's roster.

Yeah.

I'm, I'm not opposed to keeping him.

And I don't, I'm also not going to be opposed to having conversations about what his next contract might look like here, here.

And you could always trade them at any time.

You could sign him and see how Mureshov progresses.

He was up there for one game this, this year and he was okay.

Started good, got worse.

Uh,

I know they recognize him as the future goaltender, and that's fine.

You've got to have a lot of those in your system, and they seem to have those.

But when you have a guy who, and again, the rest of the season will dictate what I think they do.