Kevin Knuth

So the FLIR camera recording we had was not something dropping into the sea.

I don't know what I saw and probably will never know because it has to be reproducible, right?

You have to be able to see it again and try different things.

I think as many sensors as you can.

If I picked one, I would try.

That's tough.

I think I would go with a FLIR camera is a good choice for a few reasons.

One, you get a visual record of the object.

It's not a very good visual record because it's going to be blurry because it's infrared.

I've heard people complain, oh, the Navy produces all these blurry photos of UFOs.

Well, they're infrared images.

What do you expect?

I've heard scientists say this, and you want to slap them upside the head and say, what did you think was going to happen?

And so...

But the other benefit is with the FLIR cameras, you can measure the temperature of the object because you're picking up infrared emissions, right?

So that black body infrared spectrum actually gives you the temperature of the object.

Yeah, so not only do you get a visual record of the object, but you get its temperature too, which is, you get extra pieces of information for that.

So for that reason, I probably would choose a flare cannon.

Oh, yeah.

I would have to say the most convincing one is one of the most hard-to-believe ones.