Kevin McKernan

Let's just say, keep it short.

Yeah, so here's the thing is that PCR can pick up live dead if you use the right tools.

They just didn't want to do that because I think they wanted the presence of a pandemic or the appearance of a pandemic.

So there are a variety of tools published out there to do live dead PCR where you can discern whether the RNA is –

is inside of a viral capsid, if you will, or not.

They didn't want that.

They wanted something where they could crank the PCR sensitivity up so high that whenever you had a positive, you'd then go test the rest of your household.

That will give them five more tests.

So there was a financial motivation for them to have very high positivity in PCR because it created an exponential return on investment.

If I get one positive from you and every positive I get gives me five more because you live in a household,

This spreads a return on investment exponentially or geometrically, right?

So that did happen.

They definitely were over-calling the pandemic with PCR, and this also attributed to them labeling a lot of other deaths as COVID deaths because PCR signals could be detected in hospitals in almost everybody, even if that wasn't the exact cause of death.

Yeah.

So after I wrote that paper on PCR, people started sending me vials and I didn't have a good use for them and I didn't know who they came from.

But one day when I needed an RNA for a particular experiment, I decided I'd grab a Pfizer and a Moderna vial and throw them into this experiment as a control to see if they'd come out.

And they did come out, but they came out with other plasmids in there that no one was expecting to be there.

So this is a...

It's background in the manufacturing process.

Some would call it a process-related impurity, but it's really a contamination in my mind because they did not inform the regulators of certain sequences that were in there.