Kevin O'Leary

Think about it.

I don't think that's realistic. I mean, you'd have to take the commercial airlines into account. You need to be booking seats on every aircraft in America. I just don't see that happening. So, however, I do see the half a million that have broken the law and he has got a clear mandate from the voter. And by the way, I think this is a bipartisan issue.

I don't think that's realistic. I mean, you'd have to take the commercial airlines into account. You need to be booking seats on every aircraft in America. I just don't see that happening. So, however, I do see the half a million that have broken the law and he has got a clear mandate from the voter. And by the way, I think this is a bipartisan issue.

I don't think that's realistic. I mean, you'd have to take the commercial airlines into account. You need to be booking seats on every aircraft in America. I just don't see that happening. So, however, I do see the half a million that have broken the law and he has got a clear mandate from the voter. And by the way, I think this is a bipartisan issue.

I don't think there's a lot of Democrats saying, yeah, this is a murderer that came in illegally. Let's keep them here. That doesn't even make any sense.

I don't think there's a lot of Democrats saying, yeah, this is a murderer that came in illegally. Let's keep them here. That doesn't even make any sense.

I don't think there's a lot of Democrats saying, yeah, this is a murderer that came in illegally. Let's keep them here. That doesn't even make any sense.

Yeah, you're making, look, that point is probably on a bipartisan basis by a majority of, you know, if you check 10 people, you're going to get six of them saying, I agree with this. How it gets worked out, I mean, the administration is, it's not just Trump, the whole administration has to do battle, but you cannot go against the Supreme Court.

Yeah, you're making, look, that point is probably on a bipartisan basis by a majority of, you know, if you check 10 people, you're going to get six of them saying, I agree with this. How it gets worked out, I mean, the administration is, it's not just Trump, the whole administration has to do battle, but you cannot go against the Supreme Court.

Yeah, you're making, look, that point is probably on a bipartisan basis by a majority of, you know, if you check 10 people, you're going to get six of them saying, I agree with this. How it gets worked out, I mean, the administration is, it's not just Trump, the whole administration has to do battle, but you cannot go against the Supreme Court.

I mean, I mean, there's no way we can ignore that ultimate decision.

I mean, I mean, there's no way we can ignore that ultimate decision.

I mean, I mean, there's no way we can ignore that ultimate decision.

That's just the way it is. It's an issue that Trump is dealing with. It's an issue, but it's not the only one that people are concerned about right now. As we talk, the market's down a thousand points. There's a lot of volatility in people's net worth. Why? Tariff ripping through. There's a lot of stuff on his plate right now.

That's just the way it is. It's an issue that Trump is dealing with. It's an issue, but it's not the only one that people are concerned about right now. As we talk, the market's down a thousand points. There's a lot of volatility in people's net worth. Why? Tariff ripping through. There's a lot of stuff on his plate right now.

That's just the way it is. It's an issue that Trump is dealing with. It's an issue, but it's not the only one that people are concerned about right now. As we talk, the market's down a thousand points. There's a lot of volatility in people's net worth. Why? Tariff ripping through. There's a lot of stuff on his plate right now.

Yeah, I think what you're going to see from a pragmatic point of view, again, leaving out Trump derangement syndrome and just saying, where are we at with the current policy on tariffs? If you look at the big blocks, which is the European Union, Switzerland and England, which are not part of that union, but also trading partners, Canada and Mexico, that's about 70% of of what Trump is looking at.

Yeah, I think what you're going to see from a pragmatic point of view, again, leaving out Trump derangement syndrome and just saying, where are we at with the current policy on tariffs? If you look at the big blocks, which is the European Union, Switzerland and England, which are not part of that union, but also trading partners, Canada and Mexico, that's about 70% of of what Trump is looking at.

Yeah, I think what you're going to see from a pragmatic point of view, again, leaving out Trump derangement syndrome and just saying, where are we at with the current policy on tariffs? If you look at the big blocks, which is the European Union, Switzerland and England, which are not part of that union, but also trading partners, Canada and Mexico, that's about 70% of of what Trump is looking at.

And what he's saying, if you leave out all the bombastic statements, and I always say this about Trump, you gotta forget about the noise, you gotta focus on the signal. Because if you don't understand that after 12 years of Trump, you never will. So the noise is all the volatility in the market. The signal is this.