Kimberly Adams

So we're talking about how Trump has been using the Justice Department and other legal avenues to kind of advance his agenda, but plenty of people are also using the justice system to push back against Trump's agenda.

How successful have these efforts been to stop Trump in court?

But even in a lot of these cases where they were losing at the district court level because they were appealing or sometimes even when they got a clear shutdown, they kept going with these policies.

Like, does it matter that they're losing?

All right, we're going to take a quick break, but we will be right back.

All right.

We are back with Politico's Kyle Cheney.

And I want to talk a bit more about the Supreme Court.

What has the relationship between the court and the Trump administration been like over the past year?

And since you like the word arc, how has that arc changed?

I have to say those oral arguments for the tariff case were absolutely wild.

You had Trump's attorneys and the Solicitor General basically saying like,

These words don't actually mean these words.

They mean these other words.

The relationship of Trump with the Supreme Court is one thing.

But I also am curious as to your thoughts on Trump's relationship with the Department of Justice and how the Department of Justice is changing under this administration, which seems maybe to a lot of folks like it's not that big of a deal.

But it feels like even when it comes to sort of prosecuting economic crimes and prosecuting political figures and things like that, there's been a real shift there.

I want to talk a bit about your process because, you know, of course I follow you on social media and everything like that.

You are on, it feels like all of these cases and there are so many court cases that have been just flying by.

How on earth do you keep track of everything and choose what you're actually going to cover and report on?