Kingy

But the AFL released a statement last night.

As I say, the tribunal in general over the last week has had a period, well, two weeks.

Just you would want to forget that in a hurry.

Yeah, so they've completed their investigation.

Now, this was led by the head of football, Chris Davies, who we haven't heard from.

We've heard from the CEO, Graham Wright.

We've heard from the coach, Michael Voss, at length yesterday.

But Chris Davies has led this investigation.

This is, of course, into the events and the circumstances that led to Elijah Hollands playing in the manner that he did against Collingwood last Thursday.

The Blues last night filed that explanation to the AFL as the league had directed them.

And now, essentially, the club waits for the AFL's determination on this and whether it will and to what degree, if at all, it will be sanctioned by the league.

WorkSafe have also made preliminary inquiries with the club, and this all came after Michael Voss.

Well, he went on the offensive yesterday, the coach, in defense of his club staff and the club's level of care for Hollands over the last few years since he joined the club, even though he admitted that as far as the process goes...

They deserve to have questions asked of them, and they have provided those answers to the best of their ability.

So now the ball is squarely in the court of the AFL at the moment.

Well, there's two things at play here.

I would have thought the longer this had gone, the furnace had turned to the club as much as anything.

And Michael Voss was saying the club had been bullied.

Bully for outcomes, I think was the phrase that he used.

Not so much Elijah Hollands, although I think if he'd been pressed further yesterday, Michael Voss, he might have taken aim at the fact there's been a photographer on the family lawn as well over the time at the Hollands' house, which I think...