Konstantin Kassin

Because Murray's educated on this issue, he assumes that everyone else, including Smith, is too. Exasperated, he tries to explain that far from being revolutionary, these ideas have been pushed by discredited historians like David Irving for decades. Have you listened to his podcast, though?

Because Murray's educated on this issue, he assumes that everyone else, including Smith, is too. Exasperated, he tries to explain that far from being revolutionary, these ideas have been pushed by discredited historians like David Irving for decades. Have you listened to his podcast, though?

Far from being revolutionary, these ideas have been pushed by discredited historians. Okay, you can stop it right there.

Far from being revolutionary, these ideas have been pushed by discredited historians. Okay, you can stop it right there.

Have you listened to his podcast though? Rogan interjects. It turns out Murray hasn't, and this is later used as evidence against him after the episode airs. Unlike Murray, I have listened to Cooper's podcasts, including the one about the history of Palestine that people often cite in his defense.

Have you listened to his podcast though? Rogan interjects. It turns out Murray hasn't, and this is later used as evidence against him after the episode airs. Unlike Murray, I have listened to Cooper's podcasts, including the one about the history of Palestine that people often cite in his defense.

He details the persecution of Jews preceding the events he covers, and so he couldn't possibly be anti-Semitic, is their argument. From this, they conclude that he couldn't possibly be a Nazi apologist. The reason they make this logical error is that in the entertainment world, words do not have meanings, they are feelings.

He details the persecution of Jews preceding the events he covers, and so he couldn't possibly be anti-Semitic, is their argument. From this, they conclude that he couldn't possibly be a Nazi apologist. The reason they make this logical error is that in the entertainment world, words do not have meanings, they are feelings.

And thanks to the woke left's misuse of the word Nazi for the last decade, in podcastistan, the term is not a descriptive label, but a vague, meaningless insult used to cancel people.

And thanks to the woke left's misuse of the word Nazi for the last decade, in podcastistan, the term is not a descriptive label, but a vague, meaningless insult used to cancel people.

Unlike his opponents, Murray clearly understands that the term Nazi apologist has a defined meaning, and the fact that most Nazi apologists are anti-Semitic does not mean you have to be anti-Semitic to fit the description.

Unlike his opponents, Murray clearly understands that the term Nazi apologist has a defined meaning, and the fact that most Nazi apologists are anti-Semitic does not mean you have to be anti-Semitic to fit the description.

The Grok definition of a Nazi apologist is someone who defends, justifies, and minimizes the actions, ideology, or atrocities committed by the Nazi regime, often by excusing Nazi policies or promoting revisionist narratives that distort historical facts.

The Grok definition of a Nazi apologist is someone who defends, justifies, and minimizes the actions, ideology, or atrocities committed by the Nazi regime, often by excusing Nazi policies or promoting revisionist narratives that distort historical facts.

All right, let's keep playing. and several appearances on major podcasts, how his series on Palestine would change this reality is clearly as confusing to Murray who hasn't listened to it as it is to me who has. Indeed, one of the main areas of misunderstanding in the discussion is the role of expertise.

All right, let's keep playing. and several appearances on major podcasts, how his series on Palestine would change this reality is clearly as confusing to Murray who hasn't listened to it as it is to me who has. Indeed, one of the main areas of misunderstanding in the discussion is the role of expertise.

He doesn't claim to be an expert, is Smith's riposte to Murray's suggestion that Cooper doesn't know what he's talking about. He uses the same defense when Murray questions Smith's own willingness to opine on geopolitics. The central critique of Murray here is that he's arguing from authority.

He doesn't claim to be an expert, is Smith's riposte to Murray's suggestion that Cooper doesn't know what he's talking about. He uses the same defense when Murray questions Smith's own willingness to opine on geopolitics. The central critique of Murray here is that he's arguing from authority.

which is what the mainstream media has done for years to gaslight the public about everything from transgenderism to COVID to war. Smith and his supporters argue that the concept of expertise has been so discredited that he, and anyone else for that matter, is entitled to express any view about any issue they want. The audience, they say, can judge these views for themselves.

which is what the mainstream media has done for years to gaslight the public about everything from transgenderism to COVID to war. Smith and his supporters argue that the concept of expertise has been so discredited that he, and anyone else for that matter, is entitled to express any view about any issue they want. The audience, they say, can judge these views for themselves.