Kristen Breitweiser

And I think that that's suspicious.

Right, so...

not only did they fail to prevent the attacks from happening, which Tom Kean, chairman of the 9-11 Commission, clearly said, the 9-11 attacks 100% could have and should have been prevented.

There was enough information in the pipeline for it to be stopped on a number of occasions.

It's not just like one instance, several instances where the plot could have been unraveled, stopped, 3,000 lives saved, okay?

Or at least the attack delayed in enough time to learn more and really stop the ultimate attack.

That's number one.

But on the day of 9-11, the US government did absolutely nothing in a defensive posture to mitigate the damage of the attacks.

What does that mean?

First and foremost, my husband was on the 94th floor of the second tower.

He called me after the first building was hit.

And he's like, I don't want you to worry.

It's not my building, don't worry.

And I said, what's going on?

I'm truncating the story.

And he said, they're telling us to stay at our desks.

Well, an elevator in the World Trade Center went to top to bottom in a minute's time.

If at 8.58, the port authority and the companies didn't tell people like my husband to stay at their desks and told them to evacuate, those people would have gotten below the zone of impact and survived in the second tower.

In my opinion, there is no excuse for any loss of life in the second building.

And in the first building, the only loss of life should have been above the impact zone, okay?