Kristen Breitweiser
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And my question is, why aren't they going to their own Congress?
I don't know much about Israel's Congress or their laws, but like, why aren't they in Israel lobbying their Congress?
Why aren't they in Israel using Israel's judicial system?
mean that's a really good question and again the lawyers behind these groups would come forward the adl would probably say well it's not the taxpayers you know they're using sanctions fines and money what does it have to do with us that's what i would question i don't understand why people that go overseas and get killed on buses even if they're american citizens why they're over you know in the united states and again if you want to be compensated that fine but don't harm the rights of the widows and kids why
is it more important to pay people that are injured overseas on buses or in military installations or as foreign service members to pay them 6 to 66 times more a percentage when we live in the united states of america and every person is supposed to be treated equal under the law yeah well that's clearly not happening this is yeah in yeah this is why people's attitudes are changing in a way that's
And I would like to say that the lawyers that were that third line of collateral security combined all of the lawyers, the 9-11 and the non-9-11 lawyers.
They've made approximately $2 billion.
The lawyers?
Yeah, from the fund.
And so obviously I'm not stupid.
Like I know some of that money gets, you know, reshuffled around and made into contributions to members of Congress to reward them for their efforts in writing legislation.
But I think $2 billion to plaintiff's attorneys is kind of unseemly.
In a victim's fund that's supposed to be for victims.
Why haven't you heard the truth about 9-11 before?
Thank you for having me on.
You know, when you go back and do a study on all of the anti-terrorism laws, what you find is that there's been a whole restructuring and it's a system that doesn't... It looks on the outside like it's serving the victims, but what it's really doing is it's broadening a base and allowing for almost...
an innumerable amount of people to sue for a terrorist attack, right?
And I confronted counsel of one of the more prominent members of the Senate and I said, you know, you guys wrote this law and it opens the courthouse doors to so many people, you're harming the rights of the direct heirs, of the actual widows and children of people killed.
And like, why would you do that?
Why didn't you hold a hearing on the ramifications of how you're rewriting this law?