Kyle Hagee

In response to that, he employed news organizations like the AP, CNN, to flag to flag misleading or inaccurate posts. And now we're in 2024. Things have completely changed. Elon Musk bought X or Twitter in 2022, changed it to X, ripped up this content moderation for X and employed

In response to that, he employed news organizations like the AP, CNN, to flag to flag misleading or inaccurate posts. And now we're in 2024. Things have completely changed. Elon Musk bought X or Twitter in 2022, changed it to X, ripped up this content moderation for X and employed

In response to that, he employed news organizations like the AP, CNN, to flag to flag misleading or inaccurate posts. And now we're in 2024. Things have completely changed. Elon Musk bought X or Twitter in 2022, changed it to X, ripped up this content moderation for X and employed

Community notes, which if people don't know what community notes is on, you know, because they don't go on Twitter or X, that's it's a community crowdsource based fact checking system.

Community notes, which if people don't know what community notes is on, you know, because they don't go on Twitter or X, that's it's a community crowdsource based fact checking system.

Community notes, which if people don't know what community notes is on, you know, because they don't go on Twitter or X, that's it's a community crowdsource based fact checking system.

So if you see a post that is misleading or not or false, then you will see oftentimes a note attached to it by that has been voted on by people that that explains why it's not correct and provides a source at the bottom to say this is why this is not correct.

So if you see a post that is misleading or not or false, then you will see oftentimes a note attached to it by that has been voted on by people that that explains why it's not correct and provides a source at the bottom to say this is why this is not correct.

So if you see a post that is misleading or not or false, then you will see oftentimes a note attached to it by that has been voted on by people that that explains why it's not correct and provides a source at the bottom to say this is why this is not correct.

Yeah. And Zuck said there would be a trade-off here. He said, the reality, this is a trade-off. It means that we're going to catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. And that admission that, you know, there will be more harmful content on these platforms seen by billions of people, you know, is a serious thing.

Yeah. And Zuck said there would be a trade-off here. He said, the reality, this is a trade-off. It means that we're going to catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. And that admission that, you know, there will be more harmful content on these platforms seen by billions of people, you know, is a serious thing.

Yeah. And Zuck said there would be a trade-off here. He said, the reality, this is a trade-off. It means that we're going to catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. And that admission that, you know, there will be more harmful content on these platforms seen by billions of people, you know, is a serious thing.

And people who care about, you know, the lack of you know, not allowing fake news to spread, are very concerned about this. Employees who were against this vented on internal messaging platforms, saying this would lead to more transphobic and racist remarks on Meta's platforms that go unchecked. Other employees said this is a welcome change. So certainly sparks a debate.

And people who care about, you know, the lack of you know, not allowing fake news to spread, are very concerned about this. Employees who were against this vented on internal messaging platforms, saying this would lead to more transphobic and racist remarks on Meta's platforms that go unchecked. Other employees said this is a welcome change. So certainly sparks a debate.

And people who care about, you know, the lack of you know, not allowing fake news to spread, are very concerned about this. Employees who were against this vented on internal messaging platforms, saying this would lead to more transphobic and racist remarks on Meta's platforms that go unchecked. Other employees said this is a welcome change. So certainly sparks a debate.

Yeah, as you mentioned, Joel Kaplan going to become the head of public policy for Meta, the addition of Dana White to the board, this move to employ Musk's favored fact-checking system. All signs are showing that Zuck is trying to get in the good graces of the incoming administration.

Yeah, as you mentioned, Joel Kaplan going to become the head of public policy for Meta, the addition of Dana White to the board, this move to employ Musk's favored fact-checking system. All signs are showing that Zuck is trying to get in the good graces of the incoming administration.

Yeah, as you mentioned, Joel Kaplan going to become the head of public policy for Meta, the addition of Dana White to the board, this move to employ Musk's favored fact-checking system. All signs are showing that Zuck is trying to get in the good graces of the incoming administration.

Greenland may be the least dense political entity on the planet, but the chatter around it has never been louder after President-elect Trump has, in the last few weeks, repeated his intention for the US to buy the autonomous territory off of Denmark, its current owner.

Greenland may be the least dense political entity on the planet, but the chatter around it has never been louder after President-elect Trump has, in the last few weeks, repeated his intention for the US to buy the autonomous territory off of Denmark, its current owner.