Larry Sanger

And then the red ones are generally off limits, at least generally.

You're supposed to attribute only opinions to them.

And usually the way it works is they're not able to be used on Wikipedia at all.

In fact, that's true.

Most of the yellow ones as well in practice, in practice.

What if you... What the article is about is the state-sponsored propaganda.

What if it's... You're writing an article about a war in which that state is a participant, then it's actually pretty important that you...

that you'd be able to report about what their propaganda is, because that's like part of the story.

For sure, most of the stuff that they blacklist, if you go down the list, is either conservative or it's fringe in some other way.

It's considered fringe, but on Wikipedia, basically everything conservative is fringe unless it's conservative.

Unless it is explicitly establishment.

But even the, you know, National Review is yellow, if I'm not mistaken.

And it's, you know, as establishment as they come.

So there really does seem to be some.

But other ones like, you know.

Whatever the Federalist, the Epoch Times, the Breitbart, those are all like either red listed here or or there's another category gray, which means they can't even be.

linked to the software will stop you from from linking to them.

So even in an article that is like, I guess, about Breitbart, I'm not sure.

Interesting.

Maybe they have an override.