Larry Sanger

Should that be included?

Maybe.

I actually would have to think hard about that one.

So there are edge cases.

Anyway, so the...

My reasonable proposal – all of my proposals in the nine theses are extremely reasonable.

There's nothing particularly outlandish about any of them except to Wikipedians because they're really stuck in their ways.

But to everybody else, they make a lot of sense.

And so here, I'm simply saying –

Abolish the blacklists.

Okay, so get rid of the perennial sources page.

It began as an essay, if I'm not mistaken, and so it should be made a subpage of the person who ever started it.

And then you simply say that if there is a source which is not

supported, that is regarded by many Wikipedians as not reliable, et cetera, then you, when there is a claim made in such a source, depending on the circumstances,

It can be made, but it has to be attributed to the source.

And the other side obviously should be given an opportunity to respond with its own sources as needed.

Which is what we have been speaking about.

So I don't really think that's necessary to go into any more detail about that.

But that particular article, each of these has an article that it's linked to.

That particular article is good as a sort of introduction to the issues involved.