Lee Cronin

That's what a lot of people say. So the way to really get to genuine novelty, and assembly theory shows you the way, is to have different causal chains overlap. And this really resonates with the...

That's what a lot of people say. So the way to really get to genuine novelty, and assembly theory shows you the way, is to have different causal chains overlap. And this really resonates with the...

That's what a lot of people say. So the way to really get to genuine novelty, and assembly theory shows you the way, is to have different causal chains overlap. And this really resonates with the...

the time is fundamental argument and if you're bringing together a couple of objects with different initial conditions coming together when they interact the more different their histories the more novelty they generate in time going forward.

the time is fundamental argument and if you're bringing together a couple of objects with different initial conditions coming together when they interact the more different their histories the more novelty they generate in time going forward.

the time is fundamental argument and if you're bringing together a couple of objects with different initial conditions coming together when they interact the more different their histories the more novelty they generate in time going forward.

And so it could be that genuine novelty is basically about mix it up a little and the human brain is able to mix it up a little and all that stimulus comes from the environment. But all I think I'm saying is the universe is deterministic going back in time, non-deterministic going forward in time because the universe is too big in the future to contain in the present.

And so it could be that genuine novelty is basically about mix it up a little and the human brain is able to mix it up a little and all that stimulus comes from the environment. But all I think I'm saying is the universe is deterministic going back in time, non-deterministic going forward in time because the universe is too big in the future to contain in the present.

And so it could be that genuine novelty is basically about mix it up a little and the human brain is able to mix it up a little and all that stimulus comes from the environment. But all I think I'm saying is the universe is deterministic going back in time, non-deterministic going forward in time because the universe is too big in the future to contain in the present.

Therefore, these collisions of known things generate unknown things that then become part of your data set and don't appear weird. That's how we give ourselves comfort. The past looks consistent with this initial conditional hypothesis, but actually we're generating more and more novelty. And that's how it works. Simple.

Therefore, these collisions of known things generate unknown things that then become part of your data set and don't appear weird. That's how we give ourselves comfort. The past looks consistent with this initial conditional hypothesis, but actually we're generating more and more novelty. And that's how it works. Simple.

Therefore, these collisions of known things generate unknown things that then become part of your data set and don't appear weird. That's how we give ourselves comfort. The past looks consistent with this initial conditional hypothesis, but actually we're generating more and more novelty. And that's how it works. Simple.

But I like this whole idea of mining novelty. I think it is going to reveal why the limitations of current AI is a bit like a printing press, right? Everyone thought that when the printing press came, that writing books is going to be terrible, that you had evil spirits and all this. They were just books.

But I like this whole idea of mining novelty. I think it is going to reveal why the limitations of current AI is a bit like a printing press, right? Everyone thought that when the printing press came, that writing books is going to be terrible, that you had evil spirits and all this. They were just books.

But I like this whole idea of mining novelty. I think it is going to reveal why the limitations of current AI is a bit like a printing press, right? Everyone thought that when the printing press came, that writing books is going to be terrible, that you had evil spirits and all this. They were just books.

But that's what the big companies want you to think.

But that's what the big companies want you to think.

But that's what the big companies want you to think.

consequences and the way social media has had major consequences both positive and negative and so you have to kind of think about and worry about it but yeah people that fear monger you know my pet theory yeah for this you want to know yeah is i think that um a lot and maybe i'm being and i think i really do respect um you know um a lot of the people out there who are trying to have discourse about the positive future so open ai guys meta guys and all this and

consequences and the way social media has had major consequences both positive and negative and so you have to kind of think about and worry about it but yeah people that fear monger you know my pet theory yeah for this you want to know yeah is i think that um a lot and maybe i'm being and i think i really do respect um you know um a lot of the people out there who are trying to have discourse about the positive future so open ai guys meta guys and all this and