Lee Zeldin

On page one of the grant agreement, it says that they have 21 days to start spending the $2 billion. So let me get this right. You have 21 days to start spending $2 billion but then you're given an additional 69 days to complete your how to develop a budget training. It's wild. So EPA knew that this was something that we should have a problem with, that these folks had qualification challenges.

The EPA said they couldn't spend the money themselves, so they had to park it at this outside bank. And the problem is once the $2 billion goes through the NGO, EPA isn't even a party to the account control agreements after that. EPA loses all sorts of oversight where I can't sit before you and answer all sorts of basic questions about what happens to the money.

The EPA said they couldn't spend the money themselves, so they had to park it at this outside bank. And the problem is once the $2 billion goes through the NGO, EPA isn't even a party to the account control agreements after that. EPA loses all sorts of oversight where I can't sit before you and answer all sorts of basic questions about what happens to the money.

The EPA said they couldn't spend the money themselves, so they had to park it at this outside bank. And the problem is once the $2 billion goes through the NGO, EPA isn't even a party to the account control agreements after that. EPA loses all sorts of oversight where I can't sit before you and answer all sorts of basic questions about what happens to the money.

Stacey Abrams just wants us to take her word for it. But I don't know what in her qualification says that we should just be sending over $2 billion to her and her friends to let them spend as they wish with reduced oversight. One other example was $5 billion. went to another organization that was the former employer of the director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for the Biden EPA.

Stacey Abrams just wants us to take her word for it. But I don't know what in her qualification says that we should just be sending over $2 billion to her and her friends to let them spend as they wish with reduced oversight. One other example was $5 billion. went to another organization that was the former employer of the director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for the Biden EPA.

Stacey Abrams just wants us to take her word for it. But I don't know what in her qualification says that we should just be sending over $2 billion to her and her friends to let them spend as they wish with reduced oversight. One other example was $5 billion. went to another organization that was the former employer of the director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for the Biden EPA.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

They're not respecting choice and the ability of the American consumer to decide what kind of a vehicle to have, how they want to heat their home, or to be even able to afford to be able to pay the bills for this stuff. So this is about getting back to common sense.