Leicester

I don't know if that's really fully clear.

Some are, but not all.

And even the ones where it is somewhat, you still end up having 51% of tax happened.

Ethereum classic was a great example.

My point is that it can happen to any chain.

Most chains that did happen to did recover.

So there's light at the end of the tunnel if it is subject to such an attack.

But it's important for you to understand the importance of how complex these kinds of tricks are now.

It's not as simple as, like Satama, owners sitting on the wallet of full liquidity and they can just drain it.

Because that's too easy, right?

They're doing things behind the scenes that can drain it.

without having to have that front end spotlight on the ability to drain it.

So when you're trying to assess a project, as I close, sometimes you're not going to know upfront.

Sometimes you're not going to be aware that that risk is there, especially if the audit was not transparent or not complete or not done against prod production.

And sometimes the audits can't catch it because usually that kind of node diversity develops over time.

So upfront, it might be clean,

but then over time you're building out all these notes.

And if there's not a transparent identification and identity and KYC process in front of it, you don't know what those people are doing.

Even if you do identify them, if certain people are good at tricking you into thinking that they're on your side, let's say, Hey, I'm here to support the chain and I'm here to represent you.

They're saying that upfront, but behind the scenes in secret, they're in collusion with the leadership of the project.