Leicester

Then there's this other token.

Apparently, they're going to spin up and then try to marry the two to try to make it right for the Jasmine holders.

That's kind of the gist of what I'm getting out of this.

How is that any different than a Ponzi scheme?

Because you're taking money from project a to enrich this other thing over here.

And then you spin up another token as project B that token wouldn't have existed if you didn't take money from project a that's a Ponzi scheme.

So it didn't strike me that he was malicious.

It didn't strike me like he was a criminal.

He's on the video.

He seems like he wanted to be transparent, but it just seems odd.

That's so much in that he's, he's honest, right?

But how can that be that nobody stopped and said, this doesn't feel right folks that we're just taken from these people and we're not having anything to show for it.

And all the rumors about what Jasmine was going to do.

I remember, I remember looking at the site and it's not even in English, but I remember looking at the site when people were telling me,

This is going to be paired with the Jasmine blockchain.

It's going to do all this X, Y, Z, and it's going to skyrocket the Jasmine price.

And it's going to over, it's very similar, frankly, to block dag in that regard.

I'm, I'm stunned though, that it got so bad.

And then their answer, they acknowledge basically taking the rug, pulling you openly, essentially admitting that.

And then they're going to launch another token, which is basically a Ponzi scheme to try to make it right.