Leicester

That was at least the thought process back then.

So there was a lot of hype and everything.

And then they put out an announcement that said,

shatoshi scented book and call daria who i from what i could tell car still call is still in charge as of now i don't know because again the blog hasn't has been dead since october but these two were going to be you know advisors or whatever on their board or something for this canine now when i looked at that i i figured that was sketchy

I think the community thought it was a good thing.

I didn't think it's a good thing because when you think about, I have this product over here, let me give you a good analogy here.

Could you imagine if the government entities that created the freeway infrastructure, the original freeway infrastructure, if you could think that on that government agency that oversaw the construction of the freeway, you took two people who were in high authority

in that government agency and you put them on the board for Ford, that rhymes.

Can you imagine the conflict of interest there?

Think about it, right?

You have I'm building a freeway infrastructure for your cars, and I'm going to take these people who are in charge of everything it takes to make that freeway happen, including safety.

including number of lanes etc and i'm going to take them and put them on the board for ford and we say now these people are guiding or advising or directing or whatever they're doing for the very cars that are going to ride on the freeway what's going to happen naturally you're going to have some sort of influence over the direction of the freeway system

Then what happens means the freeway system is aligned towards one bias, which isn't that kind of, let's say cars, right?

And not trucks and not bikes and not buses, right?

You're not thinking in everybody's interest.

You're thinking in your interest.

Now, if we,

Take that analogy or any variant of that analogy.

You can flip it.

You can do the same thing.