Leicester

I did say that you got some hard times and competition is going to be very steep against you.

And I felt like they were leaning hard on notoriety, not necessarily credibility.

There's an important difference and value in credibility versus notoriety.

And we can align this to Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift has credibility only as far as music, period.

She has notoriety on a wider scale, right?

She's been seen with the president.

She's performed worldwide.

She's put out label at the, she does nonprofit.

So she has notoriety on a wider scale, but only credibility in music.

she might share an opinion about politics.

She doesn't have credibility because she doesn't, she hasn't been in it.

She hasn't done political science, et cetera.

Right?

So same thing applies.

If you do not have credibility for the topic or whatever the subject matter is, it's going to be harder for you to make a case that people should buy into what you're doing to buy into your product.

Nobody in this had any sort of credibility

outside of basics of cryptocurrency shib was basics by their own admission basics of cryptocurrency it didn't do anything it didn't have reflections it didn't have any of these pieces those were added on by third-party entities the yield farm things the ability to transact at the welly burger whatever the hell that is these were third-party interactions that any crypto could have done

They used notoriety to sell you on Shibarium being the future without the framework to ensure that it was going to be.

There are strong parallels with this and BlockDAG because BlockDAG is doing the same thing.