Leicester

And you have another entity, let's say it's formed in, I don't know, I'll pick a random country now at this point, right?

South Africa, you know, or Dubai or one of these random countries, let's just assume you have a world where node operators in these different areas of random kinds are in collusion.

And the collusion is to make sure that the value of said token for said chain is controlled.

Depending on how diverse that gets, it could create essentially a liquidity drain on the backend, whether or not they have access to the wallets directly,

whether or not they have access to, they could say lock liquidity.

They could do all those things that you see, but because they control ultimately control the network.

And because they're in collusion, they're working together.

They're controlling and directing the route pass.

They're controlling and directing the oracles for price discovery.

They're controlling everything that makes the thing valuable or not.

Because of that, it would enable those bad actors if they exist,

to essentially drain the project without you really realizing that that's happened.

Unless somebody had enough inside information to see that that's happening.

Now, how would somebody have that information?

Let's take a random wild eyed scenario.

Let's say that you had, let's say that Dow, right?

happened to be led by people who happened to be in direct contact with the CEO, getting information from the CEO, or maybe another different random situation.

Maybe that Dow was in communication with the HR person or a community person, somebody who was inside, right?

They're talking to insiders.

What if that exchange of information enabled that route where it enabled them to get access to information,