Leicester

We should call out where there are unsubstantiated claims.

An unsubstantiated claim is not FUD.

It's a claim made.

It's a statement made.

It's an observation.

We should always make observations.

We should always make claims, even if they're unsubstantiated, so long as we frame it as, well, allegedly, apparently, or this is what I'm seeing here, and we're providing analysis about it.

The reason that's critical is because if we don't call it out, others may not know that's there.

There's too much assumption about what people know or what people see or what people have access to.

All of this relies on word of mouth.

We can't provide the proof because some of these people are very good about hiding their tracks, which is why I don't like telescam.

So since they're good at hiding their tracks, we must treat it like a puzzle.

each of us has a piece of the puzzle you take all the pieces of the puzzle you connect it and a picture starts to form the picture once it's clear enough will be recognizable by somebody who has the inside knowledge and the ethics and morals to expose what's going on and then you get the last piece of it that's how this works so if i'm my message to you

I support people talking about these kinds of situations.

You must do.

It is our obligation.

If we want to clean it up, we must talk about these things.

What you shouldn't do is accuse without evidence, right?

So in this case, I can't say that Shytoshi scented book definitely took your money and ran.

What I said was Shytoshi scented book.