Leister

Then you're asking the darn thing to work around it because Excel can, and it can because Excel cheats.

And so now you're telling the AI to do bad writing.

Well, what's the difference of that versus a human?

Then when that AI screws up, who's going to be on the hook?

It's going to be that company.

This is why I say AI is a fad.

It's a fad because they don't understand that at the end of the day, AI cannot be as creative as a human.

And that is its shortcoming.

That will never change.

I'm holding my audio online so people can point at me later if I happen to get proven wrong and say, you said that.

See, I'm confident in what I say because I work technology.

I understand a lot of these things.

It sounds good on the surface.

It's going to fail.

even if you manage to get some measure of success, these AI developers and these AI programmers are going to be more expensive than just having a regular staff worker man, that one little program that you did, or writing a bunch of code where the AI, because it was trained on faulty code puts faulty code out there and you get breached.

This is why the government has to get involved because if you take the human out of it, you no longer have a scapegoat.

Now that company has to be held accountable for knowingly putting that AI in there that wrote code that allow people to get breached, but notice your government's not doing anything to affect you.

I refer to the United States when I say that.

That's the nuance of all this and why I say it's a fad and will continue to say it's a fad.

Nobody will change my mind in that regard.