Leister

I wouldn't, I don't necessarily, but I would rather that than a law that has no teeth that won't do anything to solve the problem.

In summary and in closing, I understand people's excitement about the clarity act.

I do.

I'm not suggesting we need nothing.

I'm not suggesting we do nothing.

I'm saying that it feels like a solution to a non-issue.

It feels like we're just reacting to people getting ripped off instead of properly understanding when and why they get ripped off.

If somebody chose to give their credit card to something, yes, there should be some protections.

I don't agree that it should be at the detriment of everybody else either.

If somebody puts a presale,

And some influencer misleads people as to the nature of the presale.

I think that's, that's going out to the influencer, not the issuer.

Because we can't know if the issue has the best of intentions or not until the things issue.

We have to hold them to it, right?

They say there's going to be a blockchain.

We have to hold them to it.

If you feel like their message was strong enough and you believed them enough to give money, and I can name at least three projects in this regard, to me, that's on the person who gave the money.

It wasn't like they forced you.

You weren't at gunpoint.

You weren't threatened.