Leister

The flaw of that of course, is this.

you know, crooked cop can basically just grab your finger, force you to unlock your phone and illegally access all the stuff before your attorney shows up.

It's not safer than a password, which you can just do plausible deniability and claim you don't remember the password.

They can't, how can they prove that you do or don't remember it?

Right?

Password is the ultimate insecurity.

The flaw of passwords is it's hard for people to remember them.

The more complex that they are and many services require increased complexity of the password.

This is what we're talking about in terms of usability, general usability.

So a lot of these tools lean very heavily into the idea of privacy.

Telescam touts, look it up that it's private, but it's not really inherently private.

Most of it is accessible through law enforcement.

You'd have to do a secret chat in order to hide your tracks on stuff.

WhatsApp is wide open.

You can eat it.

Law enforcement can easily get stuff.

The, uh, Nancy Guthrie,

were able to recover footage even though she doesn't have a subscription where it should be recorded to the cloud but it was still available because even though they tell you it's not there it actually is there this goes to the privacy aspect they'll tell you about privacy but that doesn't mean that there's true privacy so the bottom line is that

This outcry over what Rush has done falls on deaf ears because those people refuse to jump to other tools because they lack usability.

They're not user friendly.