Lisa Randall

So there's lots of phenomena that we don't understand, but often there are complex phenomena that will be given in terms of the fundamental ingredients that we know about.

Usually when you have a crazy, sorry, okay, when you have a far out theory, the thing you do is you test all the possibilities within the constructs that exist. So you don't just jump to the most far out possibility. I mean, you can do that. But then to see if it's true, you either have to find evidence of it, or you have to show that it's not possible without that. And we're very far from that.

Usually when you have a crazy, sorry, okay, when you have a far out theory, the thing you do is you test all the possibilities within the constructs that exist. So you don't just jump to the most far out possibility. I mean, you can do that. But then to see if it's true, you either have to find evidence of it, or you have to show that it's not possible without that. And we're very far from that.

Usually when you have a crazy, sorry, okay, when you have a far out theory, the thing you do is you test all the possibilities within the constructs that exist. So you don't just jump to the most far out possibility. I mean, you can do that. But then to see if it's true, you either have to find evidence of it, or you have to show that it's not possible without that. And we're very far from that.

I'm not sure I remember what I said then, but I mean, we have no idea how weird dark matter is. I mean, it's based on everyone thinking they know what dark matter is. I mean, so weirder than it already is. I mean, it's not already anything. We don't know what it is. So there's no normalization here.

I'm not sure I remember what I said then, but I mean, we have no idea how weird dark matter is. I mean, it's based on everyone thinking they know what dark matter is. I mean, so weirder than it already is. I mean, it's not already anything. We don't know what it is. So there's no normalization here.

I'm not sure I remember what I said then, but I mean, we have no idea how weird dark matter is. I mean, it's based on everyone thinking they know what dark matter is. I mean, so weirder than it already is. I mean, it's not already anything. We don't know what it is. So there's no normalization here.

It definitely does in the universe. I mean, so for example, there's more dark matter in galaxies than there is between galaxies. So it clumps. I mean, so it's matter. So it's distributed like matter. It is matter.

It definitely does in the universe. I mean, so for example, there's more dark matter in galaxies than there is between galaxies. So it clumps. I mean, so it's matter. So it's distributed like matter. It is matter.

It definitely does in the universe. I mean, so for example, there's more dark matter in galaxies than there is between galaxies. So it clumps. I mean, so it's matter. So it's distributed like matter. It is matter.

It's understood pretty well. People do simulations. I mean, where people are always looking for things, including us as particle physics, is sort of at small scales. Are there deviations on small scales indicating other interactions or other processes? or interactions with baryons, that is to say, normal matter that we don't understand.

It's understood pretty well. People do simulations. I mean, where people are always looking for things, including us as particle physics, is sort of at small scales. Are there deviations on small scales indicating other interactions or other processes? or interactions with baryons, that is to say, normal matter that we don't understand.

It's understood pretty well. People do simulations. I mean, where people are always looking for things, including us as particle physics, is sort of at small scales. Are there deviations on small scales indicating other interactions or other processes? or interactions with baryons, that is to say, normal matter that we don't understand.

But on large scales, we have a pretty good understanding of dark matter distribution.

But on large scales, we have a pretty good understanding of dark matter distribution.

But on large scales, we have a pretty good understanding of dark matter distribution.

I'm smart enough to know I have no idea. And also it's not even clear what science means, right? Because there's the science that we do, which is particle physics. We try to find fundamental things and figure out what their effects are. There's science like biology where It's at a higher level. The kind of questions you ask are different. The kind of measurements are different.

I'm smart enough to know I have no idea. And also it's not even clear what science means, right? Because there's the science that we do, which is particle physics. We try to find fundamental things and figure out what their effects are. There's science like biology where It's at a higher level. The kind of questions you ask are different. The kind of measurements are different.

I'm smart enough to know I have no idea. And also it's not even clear what science means, right? Because there's the science that we do, which is particle physics. We try to find fundamental things and figure out what their effects are. There's science like biology where It's at a higher level. The kind of questions you ask are different. The kind of measurements are different.

The kind of science that's going to happen in the more numerical age, or even AI. What does it mean to answer a question? Does it mean that we can predict it? Does it mean that we can reproduce it? I think we're coming up against the definition of what we mean by science as human beings. So in terms of the science that we can do, I don't think we'll know it until we get there.