Liz Truss

Currently, the British prime minister does not have

the power to hire and fire the people that run the key government departments.

The Treasury, the Bank of England, the Home Office doesn't have that power.

The prime minister needs to take that power back.

And we started losing that power in 1854.

So it's going to be a long, a long fight back.

Well, he certainly is talking about mass migration and Britain's economic decline.

I don't think he has gone as far as what I've just said needs to happen in terms of replacing the senior levels of the bureaucracy and repealing all of the laws that have been passed essentially since Tony Blair was in power, particularly.

But also some of them were passed in the 1980s that started limiting free speech.

So we need a huge overhaul.

And there's still a debate going on in Britain.

The next election is not likely to be until 2029 about exactly how far we need to go.

Because I've been there.

I know how deep the problem is.

And what I'm saying to Nigel and anybody else who may become the next British prime minister, unless you get rid of these laws, unless you restore executive power in Britain, nothing will change.

If the same civil servants are there, if it's the same structure in the judiciary, we will continue with the same failed policies because people like Starmer and Rachel Reeves are on autopilot.

They're not even controlling what's going on.

And here Starmer is now the most unpopular prime minister in British history.

He's probably more unpopular than King John.

And we know what happened, that he was forced to sign the Magna Carta after his disastrous leadership of Britain.