Luis J. Gomez
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And it is like, the thing that was real interesting about the first one, and I think probably is true about this, although I haven't seen it yet, is that even though he's obviously like a real right-winger, it's not like that's the movie. Like, the movie isn't even making a right-wing argument or anything like that. It's just like... letting these crazy left-wingers showcase how crazy they are.
And it is like, the thing that was real interesting about the first one, and I think probably is true about this, although I haven't seen it yet, is that even though he's obviously like a real right-winger, it's not like that's the movie. Like, the movie isn't even making a right-wing argument or anything like that. It's just like... letting these crazy left-wingers showcase how crazy they are.
And it is like, the thing that was real interesting about the first one, and I think probably is true about this, although I haven't seen it yet, is that even though he's obviously like a real right-winger, it's not like that's the movie. Like, the movie isn't even making a right-wing argument or anything like that. It's just like... letting these crazy left-wingers showcase how crazy they are.
Okay, you tell them. It was nuts. He just went up to these, in the first one that I did see, he just went up to these gender experts and just kept asking them what a woman is. And they all just collapse into themselves. This is the toughest question they've ever thought of.
Okay, you tell them. It was nuts. He just went up to these, in the first one that I did see, he just went up to these gender experts and just kept asking them what a woman is. And they all just collapse into themselves. This is the toughest question they've ever thought of.
Okay, you tell them. It was nuts. He just went up to these, in the first one that I did see, he just went up to these gender experts and just kept asking them what a woman is. And they all just collapse into themselves. This is the toughest question they've ever thought of.
Well, now it's way higher than that with young people because there's not... a real thing to be in trans anymore. It's the new goth, dude. It's the new goth.
Well, now it's way higher than that with young people because there's not... a real thing to be in trans anymore. It's the new goth, dude. It's the new goth.
Well, now it's way higher than that with young people because there's not... a real thing to be in trans anymore. It's the new goth, dude. It's the new goth.
False. According to law professors, I guess.
False. According to law professors, I guess.
False. According to law professors, I guess.
Well, threatening is a little bit more concrete than abusive. Abusive is really vague. Like, what do you mean? Verbally abusive?
Well, threatening is a little bit more concrete than abusive. Abusive is really vague. Like, what do you mean? Verbally abusive?
Well, threatening is a little bit more concrete than abusive. Abusive is really vague. Like, what do you mean? Verbally abusive?
Well, no, but see, even this is in a kind of a little bit vague way because he's saying asserting that sex is a biological fact. So if I just say men are men and women are women, that can't be a crime. But can calling an individual, like, could be like, no, you're not a woman, you're a man. Could that be considered abusive or whatever? It's all the interpretation. Like, what is that, you know?
Well, no, but see, even this is in a kind of a little bit vague way because he's saying asserting that sex is a biological fact. So if I just say men are men and women are women, that can't be a crime. But can calling an individual, like, could be like, no, you're not a woman, you're a man. Could that be considered abusive or whatever? It's all the interpretation. Like, what is that, you know?
Well, no, but see, even this is in a kind of a little bit vague way because he's saying asserting that sex is a biological fact. So if I just say men are men and women are women, that can't be a crime. But can calling an individual, like, could be like, no, you're not a woman, you're a man. Could that be considered abusive or whatever? It's all the interpretation. Like, what is that, you know?
What if you don't threaten them, but if you hypothetically, if that dude was like, I am a woman, and I was like, if you were a woman, I'd slap the shit out of you right now. But you're a man, so I'm afraid you might beat my ass.
What if you don't threaten them, but if you hypothetically, if that dude was like, I am a woman, and I was like, if you were a woman, I'd slap the shit out of you right now. But you're a man, so I'm afraid you might beat my ass.