Madeleine Sumption

We do not. So we don't know how many crimes are committed by asylum seekers. One reason for that actually is that most crimes never lead to a conviction. And so the perpetrator isn't known and therefore the status of the perpetrator. But where people are convicted, and we could in theory have good statistics, in practice the immigration status, so whether someone's an asylum seeker or they're on a work visa or a student visa or anything else, is not routinely recorded.

Right, so even if they've been fined, they've been imprisoned, we don't necessarily know what their immigration status is. That's correct. What we do have is some imperfect but vaguely serviceable data on cautions and convictions by nationality, and there are some nationalities...

where people are particularly likely to be asylum seekers. So people coming from, for example, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Eritrea, in most cases they will have come either as a refugee, brought to the UK by the government, or through the asylum system.

Well, I should say the data aren't routinely published. We have obtained data up to 2024 using freedom of information requests. You have to drag it out of them, is what you're saying.

Kyllä, ja luultavasti meillä on suunnitelmia, joita tulevaisuudessa voidaan lisätä. Mutta seuraavaksi, mitä olemme tehneet vuoteen 2024, yleinen kuvauksena on, että näemme melko isoja vaihtoehtoja, joissa ihmiset näyttävät olevansa nukkuutuneita nukkuutuneita. Ja on totta, että joissakin nukkuutuneissa, joissa suurin osa ihmisiä tuntuu asiloihin, kuten Afganistanissa, Iranissa tai Irakissa, on suurimmat nukkuutunut.

Yleensä ja myös seksuaalisten ongelmien kautta. Meidän ongelma on, että se, kuinka suuret ne ratkaisut ovat, on todella vaikeaa, koska emme saa hyvää tietoa siitä, kuinka monta ihmistä jokaisella kansalaisella on elämässä populaatiossa.

If you look at the top nationalities that are the sources of refugees to the UK, it does seem that when they're in the UK, the rates of convictions for sexual offences are higher. So they're overrepresented in those figures. They are, of course, a very small percentage of the overall UK population. So we're looking at probably a few percent of overall sexual offences convictions being committed by those top, say, 18 or so nationalities.

Yes, there are lots of differences. People seeking asylum are more likely to be men, and men of any nationality are much more likely to be convicted of offences than women. Those differences are really stark. We also see that people in general migrating to the UK, including in the asylum category, are in the younger age group, people in their 20s and 30s, and that's also where we tend to see

suurimmat rajoitukset rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta rikollisesta

With agentic AI, what you can do is you can ask the AI tool to do things for you independently. So the AI tool would be able to operate a browser, would be able to click, to navigate between pages, to submit the tool at the end. So whilst doing that, the LLM would itself be making decisions about what to do next and how to complete tasks. This makes it very difficult for polling companies to tell the difference between real people and agentic AI.

It seems like a real arms race at the moment between the bot developers trying to outsmart the survey researchers in developing methods of detecting this kind of fraudulent survey completion.