Madeline Halpert

Yeah, so at the beginning of the day, we heard more about the sort of interaction between... Combs and the rep for Kid Cudi. So we heard from a Los Angeles Police Department officer as well as an arson investigator with the Los Angeles Fire Department. And the arson investigator told us more about this alleged bombing of Kid Cudi's Porsche.

Yeah, so at the beginning of the day, we heard more about the sort of interaction between... Combs and the rep for Kid Cudi. So we heard from a Los Angeles Police Department officer as well as an arson investigator with the Los Angeles Fire Department. And the arson investigator told us more about this alleged bombing of Kid Cudi's Porsche.

Yeah, so at the beginning of the day, we heard more about the sort of interaction between... Combs and the rep for Kid Cudi. So we heard from a Los Angeles Police Department officer as well as an arson investigator with the Los Angeles Fire Department. And the arson investigator told us more about this alleged bombing of Kid Cudi's Porsche.

So we saw pictures of the car and the bottle that was supposed to be a Molotov cocktail that set fire to the car. And we also heard about whether any DNA was able to be recovered from the scene. So they were able to take some prints from the scene, one that was a partial match to a woman, but they didn't get more information than that.

So we saw pictures of the car and the bottle that was supposed to be a Molotov cocktail that set fire to the car. And we also heard about whether any DNA was able to be recovered from the scene. So they were able to take some prints from the scene, one that was a partial match to a woman, but they didn't get more information than that.

So we saw pictures of the car and the bottle that was supposed to be a Molotov cocktail that set fire to the car. And we also heard about whether any DNA was able to be recovered from the scene. So they were able to take some prints from the scene, one that was a partial match to a woman, but they didn't get more information than that.

And then probably the most dramatic part of the morning was they said there were other fingerprints that were taken from the scene. But the arson investigator said that the LAPD actually destroyed the evidence that same year and that usually he would be involved in any decision like that. So that kind of started this big argument from Combs attorneys who did not want that evidence to be included.

And then probably the most dramatic part of the morning was they said there were other fingerprints that were taken from the scene. But the arson investigator said that the LAPD actually destroyed the evidence that same year and that usually he would be involved in any decision like that. So that kind of started this big argument from Combs attorneys who did not want that evidence to be included.

And then probably the most dramatic part of the morning was they said there were other fingerprints that were taken from the scene. But the arson investigator said that the LAPD actually destroyed the evidence that same year and that usually he would be involved in any decision like that. So that kind of started this big argument from Combs attorneys who did not want that evidence to be included.

They were angry. They said basically that. The questioning from prosecutors about this was making it seem like, quote, somebody in the room was responsible for the destruction of this evidence.

They were angry. They said basically that. The questioning from prosecutors about this was making it seem like, quote, somebody in the room was responsible for the destruction of this evidence.

They were angry. They said basically that. The questioning from prosecutors about this was making it seem like, quote, somebody in the room was responsible for the destruction of this evidence.

Yes. Combs lawyer Mark Agnifilo called it outrageous, prosecutor's line of questioning, and he moved for a mistrial. It's not the first time they've done it, and it probably won't be the last time. So, yeah, they were just arguing that it was outrageous that they brought up this line of questioning and that jurors would not be able to go back. Of course, prosecutors did not agree with that.

Yes. Combs lawyer Mark Agnifilo called it outrageous, prosecutor's line of questioning, and he moved for a mistrial. It's not the first time they've done it, and it probably won't be the last time. So, yeah, they were just arguing that it was outrageous that they brought up this line of questioning and that jurors would not be able to go back. Of course, prosecutors did not agree with that.

Yes. Combs lawyer Mark Agnifilo called it outrageous, prosecutor's line of questioning, and he moved for a mistrial. It's not the first time they've done it, and it probably won't be the last time. So, yeah, they were just arguing that it was outrageous that they brought up this line of questioning and that jurors would not be able to go back. Of course, prosecutors did not agree with that.

So the judge, he decided a middle ground and that he said, we're going to just give an instruction to the jury to disregard it. But he rejected their motion for a mistrial.

So the judge, he decided a middle ground and that he said, we're going to just give an instruction to the jury to disregard it. But he rejected their motion for a mistrial.

So the judge, he decided a middle ground and that he said, we're going to just give an instruction to the jury to disregard it. But he rejected their motion for a mistrial.

Yeah, it was one of several lines from Clemson attorneys that kind of brought up and then we lost. But he was pressing him about why they didn't include it in the report. And the fire department official was basically just like Kid Cudi told me that was his glove. So it was not relevant to the investigation. And we moved on.

Yeah, it was one of several lines from Clemson attorneys that kind of brought up and then we lost. But he was pressing him about why they didn't include it in the report. And the fire department official was basically just like Kid Cudi told me that was his glove. So it was not relevant to the investigation. And we moved on.