Madeline Halpert

So they wanted to paint this picture of her... at sometimes being interested in actually having these. And of course, you know, she tried to clarify. At one point she said those were just words at that point. But we definitely saw a different side of the, you know, her involvement in the freak-offs there than what we saw with the direct questioning.

So they wanted to paint this picture of her... at sometimes being interested in actually having these. And of course, you know, she tried to clarify. At one point she said those were just words at that point. But we definitely saw a different side of the, you know, her involvement in the freak-offs there than what we saw with the direct questioning.

What did she give as an explanation? A lot of the times she just acknowledged that, yes, that's what I said. That's what I said at the time. She didn't have as much of an opportunity to kind of give the context because this is like cross-examination, yes or no questions. But there were times when she pushed back. There was at one point she was reading a long, many, many pages of texts.

What did she give as an explanation? A lot of the times she just acknowledged that, yes, that's what I said. That's what I said at the time. She didn't have as much of an opportunity to kind of give the context because this is like cross-examination, yes or no questions. But there were times when she pushed back. There was at one point she was reading a long, many, many pages of texts.

What did she give as an explanation? A lot of the times she just acknowledged that, yes, that's what I said. That's what I said at the time. She didn't have as much of an opportunity to kind of give the context because this is like cross-examination, yes or no questions. But there were times when she pushed back. There was at one point she was reading a long, many, many pages of texts.

And she said to the judge, this is not what I think is relevant. We're skipping over a lot of stuff. So there she's trying to get at there's a larger context that you're missing, which is, of course, what lawyers do on both sides, right, when they're trying to show evidence and prove their point.

And she said to the judge, this is not what I think is relevant. We're skipping over a lot of stuff. So there she's trying to get at there's a larger context that you're missing, which is, of course, what lawyers do on both sides, right, when they're trying to show evidence and prove their point.

And she said to the judge, this is not what I think is relevant. We're skipping over a lot of stuff. So there she's trying to get at there's a larger context that you're missing, which is, of course, what lawyers do on both sides, right, when they're trying to show evidence and prove their point.

Yeah, today it was a conversation between the attorneys and the judge. And he was saying the expectation was that Cassie would be done with all of her testimony by the end of the week. As you said, she's very pregnant, which they don't say that. They say she's time sensitive, but we can say that's the reason why.

Yeah, today it was a conversation between the attorneys and the judge. And he was saying the expectation was that Cassie would be done with all of her testimony by the end of the week. As you said, she's very pregnant, which they don't say that. They say she's time sensitive, but we can say that's the reason why.

Yeah, today it was a conversation between the attorneys and the judge. And he was saying the expectation was that Cassie would be done with all of her testimony by the end of the week. As you said, she's very pregnant, which they don't say that. They say she's time sensitive, but we can say that's the reason why.

And the Mr. Combs attorney, Mark Agnefillo, was saying basically we might need more time and the judge was not having that. He was saying, really, you guys should all be done with everything by lunch. And what about the prosecution?

And the Mr. Combs attorney, Mark Agnefillo, was saying basically we might need more time and the judge was not having that. He was saying, really, you guys should all be done with everything by lunch. And what about the prosecution?

And the Mr. Combs attorney, Mark Agnefillo, was saying basically we might need more time and the judge was not having that. He was saying, really, you guys should all be done with everything by lunch. And what about the prosecution?

We heard a lot of objections from prosecution, objections over relevance, over asking, not giving enough foundation before asking a question. I think we've heard more from prosecutors than we did during Cassie's direct testimony. A lot of A lot of and objecting to evidence, too.

We heard a lot of objections from prosecution, objections over relevance, over asking, not giving enough foundation before asking a question. I think we've heard more from prosecutors than we did during Cassie's direct testimony. A lot of A lot of and objecting to evidence, too.

We heard a lot of objections from prosecution, objections over relevance, over asking, not giving enough foundation before asking a question. I think we've heard more from prosecutors than we did during Cassie's direct testimony. A lot of A lot of and objecting to evidence, too.

There's been a lot of conversation about whether they can bring up evidence that references Cassie's relationships with other men. And there's been back and forth between lawyers about that. So definitely a lot of objections today.

There's been a lot of conversation about whether they can bring up evidence that references Cassie's relationships with other men. And there's been back and forth between lawyers about that. So definitely a lot of objections today.

There's been a lot of conversation about whether they can bring up evidence that references Cassie's relationships with other men. And there's been back and forth between lawyers about that. So definitely a lot of objections today.