Mads Larsen

So when we go into this and we talk about what has happened with women over the past, say, particularly 150 years, that explains... much of the first bottleneck. But describing these mechanisms and this process doesn't mean that I'm against it. I'm just describing these are the mechanisms that are at play. This is how human nature plays out in certain environments.

And I wish it wasn't that way, but it really seems to be that way. So this is what I will be describing. So what we talked about last year is that Our lineage over the, yeah, it's interesting to look at the last 6 million years. We became a pair bonding species around 4 million years ago.

And I wish it wasn't that way, but it really seems to be that way. So this is what I will be describing. So what we talked about last year is that Our lineage over the, yeah, it's interesting to look at the last 6 million years. We became a pair bonding species around 4 million years ago.

And I wish it wasn't that way, but it really seems to be that way. So this is what I will be describing. So what we talked about last year is that Our lineage over the, yeah, it's interesting to look at the last 6 million years. We became a pair bonding species around 4 million years ago.

And women only evolved an attraction to men that motivated sufficient pair bonding and reproduction in really impoverished environments. So men, as we talked about, because their promiscuous attraction system is so generous, they're a lot more willing to have sex with women and engage with women than what, or a lot, many different kinds of women than what women are. So if

And women only evolved an attraction to men that motivated sufficient pair bonding and reproduction in really impoverished environments. So men, as we talked about, because their promiscuous attraction system is so generous, they're a lot more willing to have sex with women and engage with women than what, or a lot, many different kinds of women than what women are. So if

And women only evolved an attraction to men that motivated sufficient pair bonding and reproduction in really impoverished environments. So men, as we talked about, because their promiscuous attraction system is so generous, they're a lot more willing to have sex with women and engage with women than what, or a lot, many different kinds of women than what women are. So if

A man activates her pair bonding attraction system. That can be a man with similar mate value as she has. They fall in love, they have sex, they have a child. But if you have an environment like you have now that appeals predominantly to, or to a great extent to the promiscuous attraction system, which is what Tinder does, et cetera, then women will be a lot more selective.

A man activates her pair bonding attraction system. That can be a man with similar mate value as she has. They fall in love, they have sex, they have a child. But if you have an environment like you have now that appeals predominantly to, or to a great extent to the promiscuous attraction system, which is what Tinder does, et cetera, then women will be a lot more selective.

A man activates her pair bonding attraction system. That can be a man with similar mate value as she has. They fall in love, they have sex, they have a child. But if you have an environment like you have now that appeals predominantly to, or to a great extent to the promiscuous attraction system, which is what Tinder does, et cetera, then women will be a lot more selective.

So we have a few things that have happened here. Women have been empowered to have their own jobs, make their own money, be free, and importantly, to choose their own partners for the first time in human history. The result of that has been that the better women are doing, the more they exclude the lowest value men from their potential pool of partners.

So we have a few things that have happened here. Women have been empowered to have their own jobs, make their own money, be free, and importantly, to choose their own partners for the first time in human history. The result of that has been that the better women are doing, the more they exclude the lowest value men from their potential pool of partners.

So we have a few things that have happened here. Women have been empowered to have their own jobs, make their own money, be free, and importantly, to choose their own partners for the first time in human history. The result of that has been that the better women are doing, the more they exclude the lowest value men from their potential pool of partners.

And with prosperity and with a promiscuous mating regime like we have now, or that is a lot more promiscuous than before, Female mating psychology seems... to channel the attention to higher value men to avoid the deception of similar value men. That's something that happens when there's high promiscuity.

And with prosperity and with a promiscuous mating regime like we have now, or that is a lot more promiscuous than before, Female mating psychology seems... to channel the attention to higher value men to avoid the deception of similar value men. That's something that happens when there's high promiscuity.

And with prosperity and with a promiscuous mating regime like we have now, or that is a lot more promiscuous than before, Female mating psychology seems... to channel the attention to higher value men to avoid the deception of similar value men. That's something that happens when there's high promiscuity.

While lower value men in an environment like we have today, even though they are receiving less mating attraction and having less opportunities and we see their number of sex partners going down, they will have increased expectations of promiscuity. So you get more and more dysfunction the further away from this third sexual revolution of the 1960s we get. This is only getting worse.

While lower value men in an environment like we have today, even though they are receiving less mating attraction and having less opportunities and we see their number of sex partners going down, they will have increased expectations of promiscuity. So you get more and more dysfunction the further away from this third sexual revolution of the 1960s we get. This is only getting worse.

While lower value men in an environment like we have today, even though they are receiving less mating attraction and having less opportunities and we see their number of sex partners going down, they will have increased expectations of promiscuity. So you get more and more dysfunction the further away from this third sexual revolution of the 1960s we get. This is only getting worse.

So the problem with creating relationships now, and this has been something that's been in the debate in Norway to an enormous extent, what very many women have said in this debate, I don't know how representative it is, but their main talking point is that men aren't good enough. And if men do not become better, women simply don't want to partner with them and certainly not have children.