Major Joshua Mast

Like, if you want to know the truth, just pull it. Get somebody to send it to you on Sipper. It's condensed with the MARSOC SJA office. It's great. I honestly, it's the best thing that could have happened to us because it gives us an ability to talk about the same facts that nobody can gag us because we have a due process right to talk about what the government tried to do to us.

And it collects like real hard evidence in one place and lays it all out. And so I think we've done the right steps as far as we've tried to, I've tried to be a good Marine Corps officer at every stage. And I've never embarrassed the Marine Corps name or my own. And I would, I'd rather die, take a bullet than dishonor

And it collects like real hard evidence in one place and lays it all out. And so I think we've done the right steps as far as we've tried to, I've tried to be a good Marine Corps officer at every stage. And I've never embarrassed the Marine Corps name or my own. And I would, I'd rather die, take a bullet than dishonor

And it collects like real hard evidence in one place and lays it all out. And so I think we've done the right steps as far as we've tried to, I've tried to be a good Marine Corps officer at every stage. And I've never embarrassed the Marine Corps name or my own. And I would, I'd rather die, take a bullet than dishonor

institutions like that's how strongly i feel about it and i haven't now that's not known but every service member that sat down and looked at this like buddies of mine or people on the board like the reason they unsubstantiate everything related to the afghans is because it's a lie and it's it's so clearly a lie and then you know one of the things my attorney made a great point in the closing argument that won the day

institutions like that's how strongly i feel about it and i haven't now that's not known but every service member that sat down and looked at this like buddies of mine or people on the board like the reason they unsubstantiate everything related to the afghans is because it's a lie and it's it's so clearly a lie and then you know one of the things my attorney made a great point in the closing argument that won the day

institutions like that's how strongly i feel about it and i haven't now that's not known but every service member that sat down and looked at this like buddies of mine or people on the board like the reason they unsubstantiate everything related to the afghans is because it's a lie and it's it's so clearly a lie and then you know one of the things my attorney made a great point in the closing argument that won the day

The government got up and they pitched an exact rerun of what these mega law firms already lost two years ago. Like the judge specifically rejected that stuff. That's in evidence at my board. The government put it in evidence. But they said the exact same argument again. It's like we're on repeat here.

The government got up and they pitched an exact rerun of what these mega law firms already lost two years ago. Like the judge specifically rejected that stuff. That's in evidence at my board. The government put it in evidence. But they said the exact same argument again. It's like we're on repeat here.

The government got up and they pitched an exact rerun of what these mega law firms already lost two years ago. Like the judge specifically rejected that stuff. That's in evidence at my board. The government put it in evidence. But they said the exact same argument again. It's like we're on repeat here.

And then the mega law firm attorneys are there assisting the government to try to go after us administratively after they already lost legally. So his most effective point was like, members, I'm afraid that our system is being weaponized for non-official purposes. And I said, because these allegations were made two years ago, and all he did was read the court's ruling. He read it verbatim.

And then the mega law firm attorneys are there assisting the government to try to go after us administratively after they already lost legally. So his most effective point was like, members, I'm afraid that our system is being weaponized for non-official purposes. And I said, because these allegations were made two years ago, and all he did was read the court's ruling. He read it verbatim.

And then the mega law firm attorneys are there assisting the government to try to go after us administratively after they already lost legally. So his most effective point was like, members, I'm afraid that our system is being weaponized for non-official purposes. And I said, because these allegations were made two years ago, and all he did was read the court's ruling. He read it verbatim.

And it says, I reject the kidnapping narrative, and they attack him for his religious beliefs or something like that. He read it verbatim to the board, and it was exactly what these people had been spewing again in this military board on behalf of these mega law firms. And it shut it down. That's why it was unsubstantiated. And you know what?

And it says, I reject the kidnapping narrative, and they attack him for his religious beliefs or something like that. He read it verbatim to the board, and it was exactly what these people had been spewing again in this military board on behalf of these mega law firms. And it shut it down. That's why it was unsubstantiated. And you know what?

And it says, I reject the kidnapping narrative, and they attack him for his religious beliefs or something like that. He read it verbatim to the board, and it was exactly what these people had been spewing again in this military board on behalf of these mega law firms. And it shut it down. That's why it was unsubstantiated. And you know what?

Senior DOJ and senior Department of Defense attorneys had this written ruling. It was a 38-page ruling. They had it for two years. Guess who didn't have that ruling? The FBI investigators, the NCIS investigators, and the board, or the recorder, the prosecutor for the government. Wow. They never saw this binding ruling against these parties.

Senior DOJ and senior Department of Defense attorneys had this written ruling. It was a 38-page ruling. They had it for two years. Guess who didn't have that ruling? The FBI investigators, the NCIS investigators, and the board, or the recorder, the prosecutor for the government. Wow. They never saw this binding ruling against these parties.

Senior DOJ and senior Department of Defense attorneys had this written ruling. It was a 38-page ruling. They had it for two years. Guess who didn't have that ruling? The FBI investigators, the NCIS investigators, and the board, or the recorder, the prosecutor for the government. Wow. They never saw this binding ruling against these parties.

So this is a binding, a ruling is binding against the parties, right? So between us and the Afghans, here's the law, right? They never gave it to their own investigators. How do you run a military officer with the recycled allegations that were already proven false? And it's that level of... I don't know the word to describe it. It's... It's not justice. Let me put it that way.