Major Joshua Mast

Is that you DNA test people coming out of the woodwork in a country that traffics children. Like, that's not a hard call, right? it was no question in our mind that that was our requirement from DOD. But that got dropped by state and then reported up the chain as the Afghans didn't want to do it or it wasn't part of their process, I think was the white lie they used. How high up does this go?

Is that you DNA test people coming out of the woodwork in a country that traffics children. Like, that's not a hard call, right? it was no question in our mind that that was our requirement from DOD. But that got dropped by state and then reported up the chain as the Afghans didn't want to do it or it wasn't part of their process, I think was the white lie they used. How high up does this go?

Is that you DNA test people coming out of the woodwork in a country that traffics children. Like, that's not a hard call, right? it was no question in our mind that that was our requirement from DOD. But that got dropped by state and then reported up the chain as the Afghans didn't want to do it or it wasn't part of their process, I think was the white lie they used. How high up does this go?

It was run on state. I think it just went up to the embassy was the one generating bad information for the administration. I believe that that got passed on because the main lies was the DNA testing wasn't part of the Afghan process, which is Technically true, but they're asking you to do it. So is it true?

It was run on state. I think it just went up to the embassy was the one generating bad information for the administration. I believe that that got passed on because the main lies was the DNA testing wasn't part of the Afghan process, which is Technically true, but they're asking you to do it. So is it true?

It was run on state. I think it just went up to the embassy was the one generating bad information for the administration. I believe that that got passed on because the main lies was the DNA testing wasn't part of the Afghan process, which is Technically true, but they're asking you to do it. So is it true?

Not from this guy's where I said if the United States lead agency Which was DoD said we commit to DNA testing any potential family members in the best interest of the child and you're you know you're in a train advise assist mission where you're supposed to Train them how to have a you know run a country how to provide security, you know stability that type of thing We're trying to train advise assist them to do the right thing and DoD did that we're like hey

Not from this guy's where I said if the United States lead agency Which was DoD said we commit to DNA testing any potential family members in the best interest of the child and you're you know you're in a train advise assist mission where you're supposed to Train them how to have a you know run a country how to provide security, you know stability that type of thing We're trying to train advise assist them to do the right thing and DoD did that we're like hey

Not from this guy's where I said if the United States lead agency Which was DoD said we commit to DNA testing any potential family members in the best interest of the child and you're you know you're in a train advise assist mission where you're supposed to Train them how to have a you know run a country how to provide security, you know stability that type of thing We're trying to train advise assist them to do the right thing and DoD did that we're like hey

the best interest of the child, you got a DNA test, we'll terrorist vet and let them know of her medical concerns and offer free medical care in the U.S. That was DOD's policy for months. And we were fine with that policy because it's rational. Where we differed from the U.S.

the best interest of the child, you got a DNA test, we'll terrorist vet and let them know of her medical concerns and offer free medical care in the U.S. That was DOD's policy for months. And we were fine with that policy because it's rational. Where we differed from the U.S.

the best interest of the child, you got a DNA test, we'll terrorist vet and let them know of her medical concerns and offer free medical care in the U.S. That was DOD's policy for months. And we were fine with that policy because it's rational. Where we differed from the U.S.

government was when they're like, oh, we don't want to interrupt the peace deal, so we're not going to require these things. Or we cannot, like what the State Department will do is like, if they want to do something, they'll say, You know, they'll come up with justification, but if they don't, they'll just cite international law and kind of hand wave it.

government was when they're like, oh, we don't want to interrupt the peace deal, so we're not going to require these things. Or we cannot, like what the State Department will do is like, if they want to do something, they'll say, You know, they'll come up with justification, but if they don't, they'll just cite international law and kind of hand wave it.

government was when they're like, oh, we don't want to interrupt the peace deal, so we're not going to require these things. Or we cannot, like what the State Department will do is like, if they want to do something, they'll say, You know, they'll come up with justification, but if they don't, they'll just cite international law and kind of hand wave it.

No, most of the Afghans were totally on board with sending her to the U.S. They're not— So how would this interrupt the peace deal? I agree. It doesn't—I mean, she was living proof it was not worth the paper it was written on, but— Outside of her being proof that the conditions weren't being met to allow al-Qaeda to use Afghan soil, I mean, there wasn't.

No, most of the Afghans were totally on board with sending her to the U.S. They're not— So how would this interrupt the peace deal? I agree. It doesn't—I mean, she was living proof it was not worth the paper it was written on, but— Outside of her being proof that the conditions weren't being met to allow al-Qaeda to use Afghan soil, I mean, there wasn't.

No, most of the Afghans were totally on board with sending her to the U.S. They're not— So how would this interrupt the peace deal? I agree. It doesn't—I mean, she was living proof it was not worth the paper it was written on, but— Outside of her being proof that the conditions weren't being met to allow al-Qaeda to use Afghan soil, I mean, there wasn't.

This was a manufactured crisis by the embassy. And I want to hit on something. You said, how did she get turned over? She got turned over by a series of letters that the embassy, quote, received. And they had factual statements in them that were drafted by the embassy that were not true.

This was a manufactured crisis by the embassy. And I want to hit on something. You said, how did she get turned over? She got turned over by a series of letters that the embassy, quote, received. And they had factual statements in them that were drafted by the embassy that were not true.