Major Joshua Mast

Because that's really— I mean, the government has—

Because that's so... I hate them. I love our people and our government needs to reflect the people. But I think that...

Because that's so... I hate them. I love our people and our government needs to reflect the people. But I think that...

Because that's so... I hate them. I love our people and our government needs to reflect the people. But I think that...

have so many documented instances in our case of over classification of clearly unclassified material i'll give you like specific examples um redactions um under pretext to hide that we were communicating with like that we were fully authorized at every level of government to do what we did because they tried to portray that this was major mass like making this up and hiding it and like going in the background like we were broadcasting from the rooftops

have so many documented instances in our case of over classification of clearly unclassified material i'll give you like specific examples um redactions um under pretext to hide that we were communicating with like that we were fully authorized at every level of government to do what we did because they tried to portray that this was major mass like making this up and hiding it and like going in the background like we were broadcasting from the rooftops

have so many documented instances in our case of over classification of clearly unclassified material i'll give you like specific examples um redactions um under pretext to hide that we were communicating with like that we were fully authorized at every level of government to do what we did because they tried to portray that this was major mass like making this up and hiding it and like going in the background like we were broadcasting from the rooftops

advocating for this little girl. And it was a righteous cause. And everything since then has been orders changing. Like I had full authorization to testify in my own case. And guess what? this mega law firm asked their former partner who worked in the SECDEF's legal advisors for assistance, and they got revoked the night before one of our hearings.

advocating for this little girl. And it was a righteous cause. And everything since then has been orders changing. Like I had full authorization to testify in my own case. And guess what? this mega law firm asked their former partner who worked in the SECDEF's legal advisors for assistance, and they got revoked the night before one of our hearings.

advocating for this little girl. And it was a righteous cause. And everything since then has been orders changing. Like I had full authorization to testify in my own case. And guess what? this mega law firm asked their former partner who worked in the SECDEF's legal advisors for assistance, and they got revoked the night before one of our hearings.

And so, like, again, this is focused on government misconduct, not the state court stuff. But who does that? Like, how does the military chain of command authorize you to testify about what you know and then revoke it the night before what was supposed to be the only hearing where we would, like, the last one? And so it was intended to prevent us from putting on a case. At all.

And so, like, again, this is focused on government misconduct, not the state court stuff. But who does that? Like, how does the military chain of command authorize you to testify about what you know and then revoke it the night before what was supposed to be the only hearing where we would, like, the last one? And so it was intended to prevent us from putting on a case. At all.

And so, like, again, this is focused on government misconduct, not the state court stuff. But who does that? Like, how does the military chain of command authorize you to testify about what you know and then revoke it the night before what was supposed to be the only hearing where we would, like, the last one? And so it was intended to prevent us from putting on a case. At all.

Like, even me telling you what I knew about Afghanistan or what I knew about the intel. I have a list over here. This is a... This right here is a letter saying what we can and can't talk about from the Department of Justice. And oh, by the way, the same attorney who defended the government's decision to turn her over to the Taliban in the first place is the gatekeeper of government information.

Like, even me telling you what I knew about Afghanistan or what I knew about the intel. I have a list over here. This is a... This right here is a letter saying what we can and can't talk about from the Department of Justice. And oh, by the way, the same attorney who defended the government's decision to turn her over to the Taliban in the first place is the gatekeeper of government information.

Like, even me telling you what I knew about Afghanistan or what I knew about the intel. I have a list over here. This is a... This right here is a letter saying what we can and can't talk about from the Department of Justice. And oh, by the way, the same attorney who defended the government's decision to turn her over to the Taliban in the first place is the gatekeeper of government information.

So she gets to decide ultimately what gets released and what doesn't. And do you think that she wants to be proven wrong that they helped hand a child over to non-relative terrorists? Or do you think she doesn't want that to come out? Who's this woman? Her name is Kathy Weier. She's a senior civil division state or Department of Justice attorney.

So she gets to decide ultimately what gets released and what doesn't. And do you think that she wants to be proven wrong that they helped hand a child over to non-relative terrorists? Or do you think she doesn't want that to come out? Who's this woman? Her name is Kathy Weier. She's a senior civil division state or Department of Justice attorney.

So she gets to decide ultimately what gets released and what doesn't. And do you think that she wants to be proven wrong that they helped hand a child over to non-relative terrorists? Or do you think she doesn't want that to come out? Who's this woman? Her name is Kathy Weier. She's a senior civil division state or Department of Justice attorney.

She represented the government in the temporary restraining order hearing where we're like, hey, all the intel is you're turning this over to non-relative terrorists. She was the attorney on that. And then she got tasked to this case years later. Is she still involved? Oh, yeah. They're very much involved. So they're the ones orchestrating.