Marco Rubio

But separate from that, it's also related to unfairness in our trade relationship. With the Canadians, obviously the border is one of the biggest, if not the biggest border, land border in the world. We share common interests there. I think they don't want to see their country filled with fentanyl either.

I think if I were them, I'd be concerned that with the crackdown on illegal immigration in the United States, people would flee north into Canada. So you would think we'd be able to work with them very cooperatively on border security. And then there's a broader trade imbalance with them that the president wants to address as well. And so that's why those conversations are important.

I think if I were them, I'd be concerned that with the crackdown on illegal immigration in the United States, people would flee north into Canada. So you would think we'd be able to work with them very cooperatively on border security. And then there's a broader trade imbalance with them that the president wants to address as well. And so that's why those conversations are important.

I think if I were them, I'd be concerned that with the crackdown on illegal immigration in the United States, people would flee north into Canada. So you would think we'd be able to work with them very cooperatively on border security. And then there's a broader trade imbalance with them that the president wants to address as well. And so that's why those conversations are important.

These are not hostile moves.

These are not hostile moves.

These are not hostile moves.

Well, we'll see. I mean, that's the president's decision to make. And, you know, we'll be prepared to address it from a foreign policy perspective. Whatever decision he makes on those things, that's his decision to make. Whether he makes it this weekend or a week from now or a month from now, he clearly wants to address both illegal migration, but ultimately also our economic interests.

Well, we'll see. I mean, that's the president's decision to make. And, you know, we'll be prepared to address it from a foreign policy perspective. Whatever decision he makes on those things, that's his decision to make. Whether he makes it this weekend or a week from now or a month from now, he clearly wants to address both illegal migration, but ultimately also our economic interests.

Well, we'll see. I mean, that's the president's decision to make. And, you know, we'll be prepared to address it from a foreign policy perspective. Whatever decision he makes on those things, that's his decision to make. Whether he makes it this weekend or a week from now or a month from now, he clearly wants to address both illegal migration, but ultimately also our economic interests.

Who is more likely to be the 51st state, Canada or Greenland? Well, again, look, I think that, you know, we're a long ways from that point. I think the president's made his his view on this very clear. And that is our interests in Greenland are endangered and that needs to be addressed. And he's willing to buy it.

Who is more likely to be the 51st state, Canada or Greenland? Well, again, look, I think that, you know, we're a long ways from that point. I think the president's made his his view on this very clear. And that is our interests in Greenland are endangered and that needs to be addressed. And he's willing to buy it.

Who is more likely to be the 51st state, Canada or Greenland? Well, again, look, I think that, you know, we're a long ways from that point. I think the president's made his his view on this very clear. And that is our interests in Greenland are endangered and that needs to be addressed. And he's willing to buy it.

And our interest with Canada, particularly, you know, I think if you go back and I think he said this publicly, he had a conversation with Trudeau and he asked Trudeau, well, what would happen if I impose these tariffs on you? And he said, well, we would be done as a country. we would be finished.

And our interest with Canada, particularly, you know, I think if you go back and I think he said this publicly, he had a conversation with Trudeau and he asked Trudeau, well, what would happen if I impose these tariffs on you? And he said, well, we would be done as a country. we would be finished.

And our interest with Canada, particularly, you know, I think if you go back and I think he said this publicly, he had a conversation with Trudeau and he asked Trudeau, well, what would happen if I impose these tariffs on you? And he said, well, we would be done as a country. we would be finished.

And his whole point is, well, if the only way you can survive as a country is by having a trade imbalance with the United States, then maybe you should just become a state. Right. And that was the genesis of that conversation. So... We have issues that we need to address with Canada. They're good friends. I mean, we work with them on a lot of things. We have a deep partnership with them.

And his whole point is, well, if the only way you can survive as a country is by having a trade imbalance with the United States, then maybe you should just become a state. Right. And that was the genesis of that conversation. So... We have issues that we need to address with Canada. They're good friends. I mean, we work with them on a lot of things. We have a deep partnership with them.

And his whole point is, well, if the only way you can survive as a country is by having a trade imbalance with the United States, then maybe you should just become a state. Right. And that was the genesis of that conversation. So... We have issues that we need to address with Canada. They're good friends. I mean, we work with them on a lot of things. We have a deep partnership with them.

But there are some issues we're going to need to address.