Marco Rubio

AI alone was going to require an extraordinary amount of energy that the world right now can't produce to fuel it. Whatever country has energy resources that are cost effective is going to dominate AI, which is going to dominate many, many fields. I think at the end of the day, it's a reminder when you talk about Canada of why energy is a national security matter and why the U.S.

AI alone was going to require an extraordinary amount of energy that the world right now can't produce to fuel it. Whatever country has energy resources that are cost effective is going to dominate AI, which is going to dominate many, many fields. I think at the end of the day, it's a reminder when you talk about Canada of why energy is a national security matter and why the U.S.

AI alone was going to require an extraordinary amount of energy that the world right now can't produce to fuel it. Whatever country has energy resources that are cost effective is going to dominate AI, which is going to dominate many, many fields. I think at the end of the day, it's a reminder when you talk about Canada of why energy is a national security matter and why the U.S.

must be able to have a reliable and consistent source of energy or we are in a lot of trouble. Our planes won't fly, our ships won't be able to sail, and our economy will not function without energy.

must be able to have a reliable and consistent source of energy or we are in a lot of trouble. Our planes won't fly, our ships won't be able to sail, and our economy will not function without energy.

must be able to have a reliable and consistent source of energy or we are in a lot of trouble. Our planes won't fly, our ships won't be able to sail, and our economy will not function without energy.

Well, the president's position on NATO is the same every other president has had. And that is that our allies, many of our allies in NATO do not do enough to provide for their own security. Every other president has made the same complaint. He's just actually been serious about it. And that's what he's pointing to. And it's interesting. And in fairness.

Well, the president's position on NATO is the same every other president has had. And that is that our allies, many of our allies in NATO do not do enough to provide for their own security. Every other president has made the same complaint. He's just actually been serious about it. And that's what he's pointing to. And it's interesting. And in fairness.

Well, the president's position on NATO is the same every other president has had. And that is that our allies, many of our allies in NATO do not do enough to provide for their own security. Every other president has made the same complaint. He's just actually been serious about it. And that's what he's pointing to. And it's interesting. And in fairness.

Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, the closer you are to Russia, the more they're spending as a percentage of their GDP on national defense. But then you have countries like France, or you have countries like Germany. These are big economies, powerful economies, and they don't spend as much on national security. Now, why? Because they rely on NATO.

Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, the closer you are to Russia, the more they're spending as a percentage of their GDP on national defense. But then you have countries like France, or you have countries like Germany. These are big economies, powerful economies, and they don't spend as much on national security. Now, why? Because they rely on NATO.

Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, the closer you are to Russia, the more they're spending as a percentage of their GDP on national defense. But then you have countries like France, or you have countries like Germany. These are big economies, powerful economies, and they don't spend as much on national security. Now, why? Because they rely on NATO.

They say, well, we don't need to spend that much on- Us. Yeah, we don't need to spend as much on defense because America has soldiers here, and if they get attacked, they'll be our national defense. So we can instead spend all that money on this enormous social safety net. When you ask those kids, why can't you spend more on national security?

They say, well, we don't need to spend that much on- Us. Yeah, we don't need to spend as much on defense because America has soldiers here, and if they get attacked, they'll be our national defense. So we can instead spend all that money on this enormous social safety net. When you ask those kids, why can't you spend more on national security?

They say, well, we don't need to spend that much on- Us. Yeah, we don't need to spend as much on defense because America has soldiers here, and if they get attacked, they'll be our national defense. So we can instead spend all that money on this enormous social safety net. When you ask those kids, why can't you spend more on national security?

Their argument is because it would require us to make cuts to welfare programs, to unemployment benefits, to being able to retire at 59 and all these other things. That's a choice they made. But we're subsidizing that. So I think if you were to articulate the president's point on NATO, number one, they need to do more.

Their argument is because it would require us to make cuts to welfare programs, to unemployment benefits, to being able to retire at 59 and all these other things. That's a choice they made. But we're subsidizing that. So I think if you were to articulate the president's point on NATO, number one, they need to do more.

Their argument is because it would require us to make cuts to welfare programs, to unemployment benefits, to being able to retire at 59 and all these other things. That's a choice they made. But we're subsidizing that. So I think if you were to articulate the president's point on NATO, number one, they need to do more.

And I do think long term, there's a conversation to be had about whether the United States needs to be at the front end of securing the continent or as a backstop. to securing the continent. And if you talk to countries on the eastern periphery, the ones closest to Russia, all of them are building the capability to be at the front end, the Poles, the Czechs, all of these different places.

And I do think long term, there's a conversation to be had about whether the United States needs to be at the front end of securing the continent or as a backstop. to securing the continent. And if you talk to countries on the eastern periphery, the ones closest to Russia, all of them are building the capability to be at the front end, the Poles, the Czechs, all of these different places.