Marianna Spring

Päivittämällä huomioita, joita hän sanoi, että hän ja Jeffrey Epstein olivat kohtuullisempia kuin sanottu. Meillä ei ollut niin monta kertaa Melania ja Epsteinin kanssa, mutta hän tuli ulos ja vältti kohtuullisia yhteyksiä Jeffrey Epsteinin kanssa. Hän ei ollut kohtuullisempi kuin Jeffrey Epsteinin kanssa. Täytyy lopettaa tänään.

who Melania knew and when she knew them and how close the relationship was. All of that has been kind of spirally out of control, which could explain why she came out to denounce all of this. Yeah, Anthony, what we were wondering, all of us, was, yeah, is there a story about to break? And whoever was going to publish that, whether it was in the press or maybe a book that was coming out, could have phoned the White House for comment.

Ja se olisi huomannut heitä siitä, että tämä tarina oli tuossa ja tulisi luoda myöhemmin. Ja siksi Melania halusi mennä eteenpäin. Mutta hänellä on myös vanha ystävä. Hänen vanha ystävänsä on haastanut sosiaalisessa mediassa, jotta he voivat kertoa kaikki Melaniaan. Ja se voi olla, että hän on huolissut, että jotain tulee ulos siitä.

Nyt on ollut muutama päivä, emme ole nähneet mitään julkaisua. Se lisää yllättäminen siitä, miksi Melania halusi tuoda niin paljon kiinnostusta itselleen, että hän oli e-mailannut Ghislaineen Maxwellista, näitä kuvioita hänen juhlapartioistaan Jeffrey Epsteinin kanssa. Se kertoi kaiken tämän uudestaan paljon ihmisistä, jotka eivät olleet miettineet sitä. Hän olisi varma, että jotain todella huonoa tulisi tulemaan, ennen kuin puhuttaisiin yleisöstä.

Ja Anthony, sinä mainitsit siellä ideaa, että Iranin maailma ei mene terveellisesti hyvin. Ja tietysti olemme puhuneet podcastissa aiemmin kaikesta kritiikasta Donald Trumpin aloittamista tämän toimintaa, joka on tullut hänen oikean puoltaan, MAGA, Make America Great Again-paikasta. Jotkut suomalaiset suomalaiset suomalaiset suomalaiset ovat aiemmin sanoneet, että he eivät ymmärrä hänen aloittamistaan tätä maailmaa.

I think it's the longest post I've ever seen him do on Truth Social. It goes on and on and on, complaining about Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Alex Jones and Megyn Kelly, who's been really critical of this war as well. This is her responding to that threat from Donald Trump, that an entire civilization will die tonight, which he posted last week as a threat to Iran.

I'm sick of it. Can't he just behave like a normal human? I mean, honestly, like the president. 3D chess. Shut up. Shut up about that.

You don't threaten to wipe out an entire civilization. We're talking about civilians just casually in a social media post. He can't negotiate without doing this? What does that say about him? What does that say about the position that our country is in right now in these negotiations? He's got to say this?

He can't be a dignified, strong leader without threatening a bunch of war crimes. So it's in response to criticism like that from people who had been some of Donald Trump's most avid supporters that had him lashing out, calling them nutjobs, troublemakers. You know, he's really being very, very rude about these losers, he calls them, who, you know, up until a few weeks ago were very firmly on his side.

Okei, Anthony. Meidän pitäisi jäädä tähän tämän esityksen jälkeen ja sanoa hei hei. Hei kaikille.

I've spoken to whistleblowers and insiders across several of the major social media companies. Some of them work at TikTok. So one who's a TikTok employee actually gave me rare access to the company's internal dashboard of user complaints. So I could see evidence about how they prioritize in terms of this system, specific cases and so on and so forth. And they in particular highlighted how they were instructed to prioritize several cases involving politicians rather

over a series of reports of harmful posts featuring children, which was really concerning to them. They also showed me some examples of content that were encouraging people to join terror groups, say, which wasn't as the top priority that they had to moderate and deal with. And I met this whistleblower over several months. They're incredibly concerned that these decisions are being made within the companies, not just to compete with the other social media companies, but also to maintain a strong relationship with political figures to avoid violence.

I also spoke to several people who work at Meta. That includes an engineer at Meta who said that they were told to increase borderline harmful content, that's like misogyny, conspiracy theory content, in order to compete with TikTok. Another senior researcher at Meta said that when they launched Instagram Reels to compete with TikTok, they didn't have sufficient safeguards in place. And I've seen internal research that shows an uptick in TikTok.

Here's a clip of him.

It's worth saying I put all these allegations to the social media companies. TikTok said these were, quote, fabricated claims, and the company invested in technology that prevented harmful content from ever being viewed. And I also put the allegations to Meta, and Meta told me that any suggestion that we deliberately amplify harmful content for financial gain is wrong. The truth is we have strict policies to protect users on our platforms and have made significant investments in safety.

One of the things that was highlighted repeatedly by the people who work within the companies is how the prevalence of this kind of content, not preventing the spread of borderline content, say. The issue with that is that lots of younger people, including teenagers, use these platforms. And so they are then at risk of being exposed to this content, which is promoted by the algorithms. And in the documentary, I met a young guy called Callum. He's now 19, but when he was 14, he describes how he became effectively radicalized by the social media algorithm's

I also went into a school and spoke to some teenagers about their experiences, particularly how when they say they don't want to see some of this violent and harmful content using the tools in the platforms, they're still getting pushed it.

Mariana Spring.

Pohja, esimerkiksi, saattaisi löytää ruokaa ja syödä sen takaisin, jotta suurimmat eivät tule ja ottaisi sen. Niin käytettävässä seurauksessa tutustuimme siitä, onko lapset tekemässä sitä, ja näyttää, että ne ovat. Se tarkoittaa, että tämä tapahtuma on normaalia, jos katsoisit sen noin puolivälillä nuorilla lapsilla. Onko se oikea? Onko oikea kuvitella sitä normaalisti?

Joten he todella miettivät omia intressiänsä, mikä on yksinkertainen näkökulmasta. Täällä he todella tekevät jotain, jota ihmiset eivät anna heille tehdä. Joten he ovat myös hieman luonnollisia ajatuksissa. Ja sitten kun lapset tulevat hieman vanhempia, kun he tulevat vanhempia, luulen, että he edistävät hieman yksinkertaisemmin, kun puhutaan siitä, miten he voivat välttää. Kuinka paljon se liittyy siihen, miten vanhemmat vastaavat omien alojeni?