Mark Gagnon

Okay.

This has now become a tool to manipulate people into believing specific, you know, sets of information.

Eddie Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

And so who has co-opted Wikipedia?

Is this being done by all sides?

Is this being done by one side specifically, one institution specifically?

How would you sort of classify that type of framing?

Of course, and not just in America, but around the world.

I mean, you can imagine, right, with any type of conflict, right, like who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, and you're going to have opposing forces on either side trying to frame the article to suggest that, you know, we are actually the good guys here.

Is it worth pulling that up?

Is it worth pulling it up just to take a look at it as well?

Now, are they using primary sources for this specific description?

Of course.

Where are they sourcing this information and what would be a better framing?

So it says here, the Gaza genocide's ongoing intentional and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.

It encompasses mass killing, starvation, bodily and mental harm, prevention of birth.

Other acts include many other terrible things.

I see.

Now, what would be a more neutral framing of this?

I see.