Mark Siljander

For example, you are emitting love. to me now, by creating a safe environment by which we can communicate together.

Okay, and that's definitional. That's behavioral. Yeah, got it. Well, that's what you do if you have any sense as a psychotherapist, and that is a logos process. Well, Carl Rogers was one of the people who formulated that most clearly, the idea that if you Freud was doing this, although he didn't say as much exactly.

Okay, and that's definitional. That's behavioral. Yeah, got it. Well, that's what you do if you have any sense as a psychotherapist, and that is a logos process. Well, Carl Rogers was one of the people who formulated that most clearly, the idea that if you Freud was doing this, although he didn't say as much exactly.

Okay, and that's definitional. That's behavioral. Yeah, got it. Well, that's what you do if you have any sense as a psychotherapist, and that is a logos process. Well, Carl Rogers was one of the people who formulated that most clearly, the idea that if you Freud was doing this, although he didn't say as much exactly.

Freud believed that if you listen to people and let them speak without, like spontaneously and without expectation, that their minds would automatically devolve towards the problems that confronted them and start to spin up something approximating a solution.

Freud believed that if you listen to people and let them speak without, like spontaneously and without expectation, that their minds would automatically devolve towards the problems that confronted them and start to spin up something approximating a solution.

Freud believed that if you listen to people and let them speak without, like spontaneously and without expectation, that their minds would automatically devolve towards the problems that confronted them and start to spin up something approximating a solution.

And Rogers, who was a Christian seminarian before he became a psychotherapist, he became an atheist, at least that's what he said, but his doctrine was still intensely Christian. He believed that if you could set up the preconditions for positive transformation by setting up a dialogue, dialogical space, a lot of Rogers' work has been used by peacemakers

And Rogers, who was a Christian seminarian before he became a psychotherapist, he became an atheist, at least that's what he said, but his doctrine was still intensely Christian. He believed that if you could set up the preconditions for positive transformation by setting up a dialogue, dialogical space, a lot of Rogers' work has been used by peacemakers

And Rogers, who was a Christian seminarian before he became a psychotherapist, he became an atheist, at least that's what he said, but his doctrine was still intensely Christian. He believed that if you could set up the preconditions for positive transformation by setting up a dialogue, dialogical space, a lot of Rogers' work has been used by peacemakers

like consciously by peacemakers trying to mediate between groups with opposing views. One of the Rogerian presuppositions, for example, it's a very useful one, is that you listen carefully to what someone says, And then you repeat back to them what you think they said until they agree with your summary to ensure that genuine comprehension has been established.

like consciously by peacemakers trying to mediate between groups with opposing views. One of the Rogerian presuppositions, for example, it's a very useful one, is that you listen carefully to what someone says, And then you repeat back to them what you think they said until they agree with your summary to ensure that genuine comprehension has been established.

like consciously by peacemakers trying to mediate between groups with opposing views. One of the Rogerian presuppositions, for example, it's a very useful one, is that you listen carefully to what someone says, And then you repeat back to them what you think they said until they agree with your summary to ensure that genuine comprehension has been established.

And it's a Rogerian presumption that when that happens, there's transformation on the part of both participating parties. But to me, that's a reflection of something Rogers knew as a Protestant seminarian that, you know, where there are two or more gathered in Christ's name, so to speak, then the spirit is there.

And it's a Rogerian presumption that when that happens, there's transformation on the part of both participating parties. But to me, that's a reflection of something Rogers knew as a Protestant seminarian that, you know, where there are two or more gathered in Christ's name, so to speak, then the spirit is there.

And it's a Rogerian presumption that when that happens, there's transformation on the part of both participating parties. But to me, that's a reflection of something Rogers knew as a Protestant seminarian that, you know, where there are two or more gathered in Christ's name, so to speak, then the spirit is there.

And I think that's actually technically true from a psychological perspective, because when people can communicate freely, a transformative process that aims at something like peace and cooperation does make itself manifest. And I think you can tell when that's happening because the conversation is meaningful and engaging. That shows you how deeply it

And I think that's actually technically true from a psychological perspective, because when people can communicate freely, a transformative process that aims at something like peace and cooperation does make itself manifest. And I think you can tell when that's happening because the conversation is meaningful and engaging. That shows you how deeply it

And I think that's actually technically true from a psychological perspective, because when people can communicate freely, a transformative process that aims at something like peace and cooperation does make itself manifest. And I think you can tell when that's happening because the conversation is meaningful and engaging. That shows you how deeply it

That process is in accordance even with the instincts that mediate attention.