Mark Zuckerberg

But it's also... I don't know.

It's very hard to reason about exactly how this goes.

I tend to think that in the cosmic scale, obviously, it'll happen quickly over a couple of decades or something.

But I do think that there is some set of people who are afraid of...

know it really just kind of spins and goes from being like somewhat intelligent to extremely intelligent overnight and i just think that there's all these physical constraints that make that so that's unlikely to happen um i i just don't i don't really see that that playing out so i think you'll have i think we'll have time to kind of acclimate a bit but it will really change the way that we work and give people all these creative tools to do different things that they

I think people like to... The history of humanity, I think, has been people basically thinking that certain aspects of humanity are like

really unique in different ways and then coming to grips with the fact that that's not true but humanity is actually still super special right so it's um it's like we thought that the earth was the center of the universe and it's like it's not but like it's like humans are still pretty awesome right and pretty unique um i think that another bias that people tend to have is thinking that intelligence is somehow

kind of fundamentally connected to life and it's not actually clear that it is right i think like like people think that um i mean i don't know that we have a clear enough definition of consciousness or um or or life to kind of fully um interrogate this but um

I know there's all this science fiction about, okay, you create intelligence and now it starts taking on all these human-like behaviors and things like that.

But I actually think that the current incarnation of all this stuff, at least, kind of feels like it's going in a direction where intelligence can be pretty separated from consciousness and agency and things like that.

That...

I think just makes it a super valuable tool.

So I don't know.

I mean, obviously it's very difficult to predict what direction this stuff goes in over time, which is why I don't think anyone should be dogmatic about how they plan to develop it or what they plan to do.

I think you want to kind of look at each release.

It's like we're obviously very pro-open source, but I haven't committed that we're going to release every single thing that we do.

But it's basically, I'm just generally very inclined to thinking that open sourcing it is going to be

good for the community and also good for us, right?

Because we'll benefit from the innovations.

But if at some point, like there's some qualitative change in what the thing is capable of and we feel like it's just not responsible to open source it, then we won't.