Mark Zuckerberg

I mean, maybe the model just ends up being more of the product itself.

In that case, then I think it's a trickier economic calculation about whether you open source that because then you are kind of commoditizing yourself a lot.

But from what I can see so far, it doesn't seem like we're in that zone.

Yeah.

We want to have an arrangement like that, but I don't know how significant it'll be.

And we have this... This is basically our license for Llama.

Yeah.

You know, in a lot of ways, it's like a very permissive open source license, except that we have a limit for the largest companies using it.

And this is why we put that limit in, is we're not trying to prevent them from using it.

We just want them to come talk to us because if they're going to just basically take what we built and resell it and make money off of it, then it's like, okay, well...

If you're Microsoft Azure or Amazon, then yeah, if you're going to be reselling the model, then we should have some revenue share on that.

So just come talk to us before you go do that.

And that's how that's played out.

So for Lama2, we basically just have deals with all these major cloud companies.

And Lama2 is available as a hosted service on all those clouds.

And

I assume that as we release bigger and bigger models, that'll become a bigger thing.

It's not the main thing that we're doing, but I just think if those companies are going to be selling our models, it makes sense that we should share the upside of that somehow.

Yeah, no, I think that that's a fair point on the existential risk side.

Right now, we focus more on the types of risks that we see today, which are more of these content risks.